Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Differential Effects of Open- and Closed-Loop Intracortical Microstimulation on Firing Patterns of Neurons in Distant Cortical Areas.
Averna, Alberto; Pasquale, Valentina; Murphy, Maxwell D; Rogantin, Maria Piera; Van Acker, Gustaf M; Nudo, Randolph J; Chiappalone, Michela; Guggenmos, David J.
Afiliação
  • Averna A; Rehab Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
  • Pasquale V; Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal and Child science (DINOGMI), University of Genova, 16145 Genova, Italy.
  • Murphy MD; Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
  • Rogantin MP; Neuroscience and Brain Technologies, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, 16163 Genova, Italy.
  • Van Acker GM; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Nudo RJ; Department of Mathematics, University of Genova, 16146 Genova, Italy.
  • Chiappalone M; Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
  • Guggenmos DJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.
Cereb Cortex ; 30(5): 2879-2896, 2020 05 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31832642
ABSTRACT
Intracortical microstimulation can be used successfully to modulate neuronal activity. Activity-dependent stimulation (ADS), in which action potentials recorded extracellularly from a single neuron are used to trigger stimulation at another cortical location (closed-loop), is an effective treatment for behavioral recovery after brain lesion, but the related neurophysiological changes are still not clear. Here, we investigated the ability of ADS and random stimulation (RS) to alter firing patterns of distant cortical locations. We recorded 591 neuronal units from 23 Long-Evan healthy anesthetized rats. Stimulation was delivered to either forelimb or barrel field somatosensory cortex, using either RS or ADS triggered from spikes recorded in the rostral forelimb area (RFA). Both RS and ADS stimulation protocols rapidly altered spike firing within RFA compared with no stimulation. We observed increase in firing rates and change of spike patterns. ADS was more effective than RS in increasing evoked spikes during the stimulation periods, by producing a reliable, progressive increase in stimulus-related activity over time and an increased coupling of the trigger channel with the network. These results are critical for understanding the efficacy of closed-loop electrical microstimulation protocols in altering activity patterns in interconnected brain networks, thus modulating cortical state and functional connectivity.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Córtex Somatossensorial / Potenciais de Ação / Córtex Motor / Rede Nervosa / Neurônios Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Assunto da revista: CEREBRO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Córtex Somatossensorial / Potenciais de Ação / Córtex Motor / Rede Nervosa / Neurônios Tipo de estudo: Guideline Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Cereb Cortex Assunto da revista: CEREBRO Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália