Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
; 247: 127-131, 2020 Apr.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-32092668
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare medium/long-term outcomes in terms of pelvic floor function, patient reported prolapse recurrence and repeat prolapse surgery after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP) and vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension (VH&McCall) which is the most commonly performed surgical option for severe uterine prolapse from past to present. STUDYDESIGN:
Files of patients who underwent LSHP and VH&McCall for advanced utero-vaginal prolapse (stage 3 & 4) at the Department of Gynecology in Ankara University School of Medicine between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed (n = 517). Data of women who were followed up for at least 1-year and containing both the full-filled Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) survey and Turkish validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), were included.RESULTS:
A total of 132 women were included in the study; 46 women who underwent LSHP and 86 women who underwent VH&McCall. Even though the median age of the LSHP group was significantly lower than the median age of VH&McCall group (42 vs. 67 years; P<;0.001), recurrence and repeat surgery rates were found to be similar after both surgical approaches as well as the scores of PGI-I and PFDI-20. However, in women who were operated before their sixties, symptomatic recurrence was found to be significantly lower after LSHP than VH&McCall (16.2 % vs. 47.4 %, respectively; P = 0.024) as well as repeat prolapse surgery (2.7 % vs. 26.3 %, respectively; P = 0.014). PGI-I and PFDI-20 scores also suggested better pelvic floor function after LSHP significantly (p = 0.004 & p = 0.003 respectively). When adjusted for age, VH&McCall significantly increased the risk of symptomatic prolapse recurrence compared to LSHP (OR 4.65; 95 % CI 1.326-16.312; P = 0.016).CONCLUSION:
LSHP and VH&McCall might seem to be surgical options for individualized management with similar pelvic floor function & recurrence in the medium/long-term follow-up, but the age adjusted risk analysis showed higher rates of symptomatic recurrence after VH&McCall. Moreover, the better outcomes after LSHP in the younger subset, revealed the need of further clarification with well-designed prospective studies.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia
/
Prolapso Uterino
Tipo de estudo:
Observational_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Adult
/
Aged
/
Aged80
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Middle aged
País/Região como assunto:
Asia
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Ano de publicação:
2020
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Turquia