Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of patient reported outcomes, pelvic floor function and recurrence after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension for advanced uterine prolapse.
Sükür, Yavuz Emre; Dökmeci, Fulya; Çetinkaya, Serife Esra; Seval, Mehmet Murat.
Afiliação
  • Sükür YE; Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Dökmeci F; Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: fdokmeci@gmail.com.
  • Çetinkaya SE; Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Seval MM; Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 247: 127-131, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32092668
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare medium/long-term outcomes in terms of pelvic floor function, patient reported prolapse recurrence and repeat prolapse surgery after laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSHP) and vaginal hysterectomy with McCall suspension (VH&McCall) which is the most commonly performed surgical option for severe uterine prolapse from past to present. STUDY

DESIGN:

Files of patients who underwent LSHP and VH&McCall for advanced utero-vaginal prolapse (stage 3 & 4) at the Department of Gynecology in Ankara University School of Medicine between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed (n = 517). Data of women who were followed up for at least 1-year and containing both the full-filled Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) survey and Turkish validated Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), were included.

RESULTS:

A total of 132 women were included in the study; 46 women who underwent LSHP and 86 women who underwent VH&McCall. Even though the median age of the LSHP group was significantly lower than the median age of VH&McCall group (42 vs. 67 years; P<;0.001), recurrence and repeat surgery rates were found to be similar after both surgical approaches as well as the scores of PGI-I and PFDI-20. However, in women who were operated before their sixties, symptomatic recurrence was found to be significantly lower after LSHP than VH&McCall (16.2 % vs. 47.4 %, respectively; P = 0.024) as well as repeat prolapse surgery (2.7 % vs. 26.3 %, respectively; P = 0.014). PGI-I and PFDI-20 scores also suggested better pelvic floor function after LSHP significantly (p = 0.004 & p = 0.003 respectively). When adjusted for age, VH&McCall significantly increased the risk of symptomatic prolapse recurrence compared to LSHP (OR 4.65; 95 % CI 1.326-16.312; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSION:

LSHP and VH&McCall might seem to be surgical options for individualized management with similar pelvic floor function & recurrence in the medium/long-term follow-up, but the age adjusted risk analysis showed higher rates of symptomatic recurrence after VH&McCall. Moreover, the better outcomes after LSHP in the younger subset, revealed the need of further clarification with well-designed prospective studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia / Prolapso Uterino Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia / Prolapso Uterino Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Turquia