Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Polyp detection algorithm can detect small polyps: Ex vivo reading test compared with endoscopists.
Guo, Zhe; Nemoto, Daiki; Zhu, Xin; Li, Qin; Aizawa, Masato; Utano, Kenichi; Isohata, Noriyuki; Endo, Shungo; Kawarai Lefor, Alan; Togashi, Kazutomo.
Afiliação
  • Guo Z; Biomedical Information Engineering Lab, The University of Aizu, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Nemoto D; Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Zhu X; Biomedical Information Engineering Lab, The University of Aizu, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Li Q; Biomedical Information Engineering Lab, The University of Aizu, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Aizawa M; Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Utano K; Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Isohata N; Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Endo S; Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  • Kawarai Lefor A; Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
  • Togashi K; Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Dig Endosc ; 33(1): 162-169, 2021 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32173917
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY

AIMS:

Small polyps are occasionally missed during colonoscopy. This study was conducted to validate the diagnostic performance of a polyp-detection algorithm to alert endoscopists to unrecognized lesions.

METHODS:

A computer-aided detection (CADe) algorithm was developed based on convolutional neural networks using training data from 1991 still colonoscopy images from 283 subjects with adenomatous polyps. The CADe algorithm was evaluated on a validation dataset including 50 short videos with 1-2 polyps (3.5 ± 1.5 mm, range 2-8 mm) and 50 videos without polyps. Two expert colonoscopists and two physicians in training separately read the same videos, blinded to the presence of polyps. The CADe algorithm was also evaluated using eight full videos with polyps and seven full videos without a polyp.

RESULTS:

The per-video sensitivity of CADe for polyp detection was 88% and the per-frame false-positive rate was 2.8%, with a confidence level of ≥30%. The per-video sensitivity of both experts was 88%, and the sensitivities of the two physicians in training were 84% and 76%. For each reader, the frames with missed polyps appearing on short videos were significantly less than the frames with detected polyps, but no trends were observed regarding polyp size, morphology or color. For full video readings, per-polyp sensitivity was 100% with a per-frame false-positive rate of 1.7%, and per-frame specificity of 98.3%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The sensitivity of CADe to detect small polyps was almost equivalent to experts and superior to physicians in training. A clinical trial using CADe is warranted.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo / Pólipos Adenomatosos / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dig Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pólipos do Colo / Pólipos Adenomatosos / Aprendizado Profundo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Dig Endosc Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão