Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Screening archaeological bone for palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic studies.
Kontopoulos, Ioannis; Penkman, Kirsty; Mullin, Victoria E; Winkelbach, Laura; Unterländer, Martina; Scheu, Amelie; Kreutzer, Susanne; Hansen, Henrik B; Margaryan, Ashot; Teasdale, Matthew D; Gehlen, Birgit; Street, Martin; Lynnerup, Niels; Liritzis, Ioannis; Sampson, Adamantios; Papageorgopoulou, Christina; Allentoft, Morten E; Burger, Joachim; Bradley, Daniel G; Collins, Matthew J.
Afiliação
  • Kontopoulos I; Department of Archaeology, BioArCh, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
  • Penkman K; Department of Chemistry, BioArCh, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
  • Mullin VE; Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Winkelbach L; Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
  • Unterländer M; Palaeogenetics Group, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iomE), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Scheu A; Palaeogenetics Group, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iomE), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Kreutzer S; Laboratory of Physical Anthropology, Department of History and Ethnology, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece.
  • Hansen HB; German Federal Criminal Police Office, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  • Margaryan A; Palaeogenetics Group, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iomE), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Teasdale MD; Palaeogenetics Group, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iomE), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Gehlen B; Centre for GeoGenetics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Street M; Centre for GeoGenetics, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Lynnerup N; Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Liritzis I; Department of Archaeology, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Sampson A; Collaborative Research Centre, project D4, Cologne University, Cologne, Germany.
  • Papageorgopoulou C; MONREPOS Archaeological Research Centre and Museum for Human Behavioural Evolution, RGZM Leibniz Research Institute for Archaeology, Neuwied, Germany.
  • Allentoft ME; Unit of Forensic Anthropology, Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Burger J; Laboratory of Archaeometry, Department of Mediterranean Studies, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, Greece.
  • Bradley DG; Center on Yellow River Civilization of Henan Province, Key Research Institute of Yellow River Civilization and Sustainable Development and Collaborative Innovation, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
  • Collins MJ; Department of Mediterranean Studies, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, Greece.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0235146, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584871
ABSTRACT
The recovery and analysis of ancient DNA and protein from archaeological bone is time-consuming and expensive to carry out, while it involves the partial or complete destruction of valuable or rare specimens. The fields of palaeogenetic and palaeoproteomic research would benefit greatly from techniques that can assess the molecular quality prior to sampling. To be relevant, such screening methods should be effective, minimally-destructive, and rapid. This study reports results based on spectroscopic (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy in attenuated total reflectance [FTIR-ATR]; n = 266), palaeoproteomic (collagen content; n = 226), and palaeogenetic (endogenous DNA content; n = 88) techniques. We establish thresholds for three different FTIR indices, a) the infrared splitting factor [IRSF] that assesses relative changes in bioapatite crystals' size and homogeneity; b) the carbonate-to-phosphate [C/P] ratio as a relative measure of carbonate content in bioapatite crystals; and c) the amide-to-phosphate ratio [Am/P] for assessing the relative organic content preserved in bone. These thresholds are both extremely reliable and easy to apply for the successful and rapid distinction between well- and poorly-preserved specimens. This is a milestone for choosing appropriate samples prior to genomic and collagen analyses, with important implications for biomolecular archaeology and palaeontology.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arqueologia / Osso e Ossos / Proteômica / DNA Antigo / Fósseis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arqueologia / Osso e Ossos / Proteômica / DNA Antigo / Fósseis Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Assunto da revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido