Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Three-Dimensionally-Printed Bioactive Ceramic Scaffolds: Construct Effects on Bone Regeneration.
Fama, Christopher; Kaye, Gabriel J; Flores, Roberto; Lopez, Christopher D; Bekisz, Jonathan M; Torroni, Andrea; Tovar, Nick; Coelho, Paulo G; Witek, Lukasz.
Afiliação
  • Fama C; Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Kaye GJ; Columbia University College of Dental Medicine.
  • Flores R; Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Lopez CD; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Bekisz JM; Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Torroni A; Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Tovar N; Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry.
  • Coelho PG; Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
  • Witek L; Department of Biomaterials, New York University College of Dentistry.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(3): 1177-1181, 2021 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003153
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

PURPOSE:

The utilization of three-dimensionally (3D)-printed bioceramic scaffolds composed of beta-tricalcium phosphate in conjunction with dipyridamole have shown to be effective in the osteogenesis of critical bone defects in both skeletally immature and mature animals. Furthermore, previous studies have proven the dura and pericranium's osteogenic capacity in the presence of 3D-printed scaffolds; however, the effect galea aponeurotica on osteogenesis in the presence of 3D scaffolds remains unclear. METHOD/DESCRIPTION Critical-sized (11 mm) bilateral calvarial defects were created in 35-day old rabbits (n = 7). Two different 3D scaffolds were created, with one side of the calvaria being treated with a solid nonporous cap and the other with a fully porous cap. The solid cap feature was designed with the intention of preventing communication of the galea and the ossification site, while the porous cap permitted such communication. The rabbits were euthanized 8 weeks postoperatively. Calvaria were analyzed using microcomputed tomography, 3D reconstruction, and nondecalcified histologic sectioning in order assess differences in bone growth between the two types of scaffolding.

RESULTS:

Scaffolds with the solid (nonporous) cap yielded greater percent bone volume (P = 0.012) as well as a greater percent potential bone (P = 0.001) compared with the scaffolds with a porous cap. The scaffolds with porous caps also exhibited a greater percent volume of soft tissue (P < 0.001) presence. There were no statistically significant differences detected in scaffold volume.

CONCLUSION:

A physical barrier preventing the interaction of the galea aponeurotica with the scaffold leads to significantly increased calvarial bone regeneration in comparison with the scaffolds allowing for this interaction. The galea's interaction also leads to more soft tissue growth hindering the in growth of bone in the porous-cap scaffolds.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alicerces Teciduais / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Panamá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Alicerces Teciduais / Impressão Tridimensional Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Panamá