Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Use of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter in Adult Females.
Peyronnet, Benoit; Greenwell, Tamsin; Gray, Gary; Khavari, Rose; Thiruchelvam, Nikesh; Capon, Grégoire; Ockrim, Jeremy; Lopez-Fando, Luis; Gilleran, Jason; Fournier, Georges; Van Koeveringe, Gommert A; Van Der Aa, Frank.
Afiliação
  • Peyronnet B; Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France. peyronnetbenoit@hotmail.fr.
  • Greenwell T; Service d'Urologie, Hopital Pontchaillou, 2 rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35000, Rennes, France. peyronnetbenoit@hotmail.fr.
  • Gray G; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
  • Khavari R; Department of Urology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • Thiruchelvam N; Department of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Capon G; Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ockrim J; Department of Urology, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
  • Lopez-Fando L; Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
  • Gilleran J; Department of Urology, University Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
  • Fournier G; Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
  • Van Koeveringe GA; Department of Urology, University of Brest, Brest, France.
  • Van Der Aa F; Department of Urology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Curr Urol Rep ; 21(12): 53, 2020 Oct 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098485
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of the present report was to review the recent evidences regarding the use of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in adult females. RECENT

FINDINGS:

While the excellent functional outcomes of AUS in female patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) have been reported for decades, its use has remained confidential in most countries likely due to its challenging implantation and inherent morbidity. Over the past few years, laparoscopic and, more recently, robotic techniques of AUS implantation in female patients have been described with promising perioperative outcomes. As a result, the use of AUS has increased in several countries. The indications are mostly recurrent or persistent SUI after previous anti-incontinence procedures and neurogenic SUI. Owing to its unique potential to restore continence while maintaining low outlet resistance during the voiding phase, AUS may be of special interest in female patients with detrusor underactivity. High level of evidence data from trials which are underway, along with developments in robotic surgery and technological refinements of the device, may well, almost 50 years after its introduction, give to the AUS its momentum as a major contributor in the female SUI armamentarium. While the use of AUS in female patients has been restricted to some countries and a few high-volume centers, it has started spreading again over the past few years, thanks to the rise of minimally invasive approaches which facilitate its implantation, and this is yielding promising outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Incontinência Urinária por Estresse / Esfíncter Urinário Artificial / Implantação de Prótese Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Urol Rep Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Incontinência Urinária por Estresse / Esfíncter Urinário Artificial / Implantação de Prótese Limite: Adult / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Curr Urol Rep Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França