Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Review of Otolaryngology Malpractice Cases with Associated Court Proceedings from 2010 to 2019.
Ceremsak, John; Miller, Lauren E; Gomez, Ernest D.
Afiliação
  • Ceremsak J; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
  • Miller LE; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
  • Gomez ED; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope ; 131(4): E1081-E1085, 2021 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146898
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/

HYPOTHESIS:

To report key characteristics of the landscape of malpractice litigation with associated court proceedings in otolaryngology over the previous decade. STUDY

DESIGN:

Retrospective database review.

METHODS:

The LexisNexis database was queried to identify otolaryngology-related malpractices cases that yielded court opinions, jury verdicts, and settlements from federal and state courts across the United States from 2010 to 2019. Cases settled outside of court were not identifiable. Provider subspecialty, procedures, error type, legal allegations, and case outcomes were recorded. Frequency of error type was compared between otolaryngology subspecialties using Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS:

Ninety-four medical malpractice cases related to otolaryngology with evidence of court proceedings were identified for the period between 2010 and 2019. An otolaryngologist was named as the sole defendant in 39 cases (41%). Rhinology was the most frequently implicated subspecialty (28% of all cases), followed by head and neck surgery (17%) and facial plastics (7%). Improper surgical performance was cited in nearly half of the identified cases (49%), followed by failure to diagnose/refer/treat (32%). Outcome and liability data were available for 56 cases (60%). Of these 56 cases, 50 (89%) were ruled in favor of the defendant otolaryngologist. Of the cases ruled in favor of the plaintiff, the average indemnity was $4.24 M (range, $150,000 M-$10.25 M). Fisher exact tests demonstrated statistically significant differences in consent issues (P = .040), failure to diagnose/refer/treat (P = .024), and improper surgical performance (P = .026) between subspecialties.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a limited, database-derived sample of medical malpractice cases involving otolaryngologists, trends in error type by subspecialty may warrant further investigation to identify specialty-wide and subspecialty-specific areas of practice improvement and education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A Laryngoscope, 131E1081-E1085, 2021.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Otolaringologia / Imperícia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Otolaringologia / Imperícia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Laryngoscope Assunto da revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos