Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Electrocoagulation-electrooxidation for mitigating trace organic compounds in model drinking water sources.
Ryan, Donald R; Maher, Emily K; Heffron, Joe; Mayer, Brooke K; McNamara, Patrick J.
Afiliação
  • Ryan DR; Department of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
  • Maher EK; Department of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
  • Heffron J; Department of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
  • Mayer BK; Department of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA.
  • McNamara PJ; Department of Civil Construction and Environmental Engineering Marquette University Milwaukee, WI, 53233, USA. Electronic address: Patrick.McNamara@marquette.edu.
Chemosphere ; 273: 129377, 2021 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33517114
ABSTRACT
In-situ water treatment can be accomplished using electrochemical treatments such as electrocoagulation (EC), which generates coagulants, and electrooxidation (EO), which generates oxidants (e.g., free chlorine and reactive oxygen species) via electrolysis using boron-doped diamond electrodes. In sequential EC-EO, EC can remove oxidant scavengers present in dissolved organic carbon (DOC), thereby improving the efficacy of downstream oxidation via EO. This study evaluated sequential EC-EO (and each process independently for comparison) for mitigating the trace organic compounds (TOrCs) acyclovir (ACY), trimethoprim (TMP), and benzyldimethyldecylammonium chloride (BAC-C10) in model groundwaters and surface waters. EO-only removed greater than 70% of ACY and TMP but negligible BAC-C10 in model groundwaters. In model surface waters, EO-only removed ∼55-75% BAC-C10, but had less removal for ACY and TMP (∼20-55%), primarily due to DOC interference. Sequential-EC-EO was investigated to better gauge the potential process improvement due to the addition of EC ahead of EO. EC removed 74 ± 7% DOC from model surface water and improved downstream EO treatment relative to EO-only by a factor of 3.4 for ACY, 1.7 for TMP, and 1.4 for BAC-C10. When treating model groundwater, EC-EO resulted in no improvement compared to EO-only for ACY and TMP. BAC-C10 removal was attributed to the particle separation step between EC and EO rather than electrochemical inputs. EO-only treatment was more energy efficient for model groundwater compared to model surface waters based on electrical energy per order (EEO) values. Sequential EC-EO further improved the energy efficiency for treating model river water.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Água Potável / Purificação da Água Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Chemosphere Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Poluentes Químicos da Água / Água Potável / Purificação da Água Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Chemosphere Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos