Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In-vitro glistening formation in six different foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses.
Tandogan, Tamer; Auffarth, Gerd U; Son, Hyeck-Soo; Merz, Patrick; Choi, Chul Young; Khoramnia, Ramin.
Afiliação
  • Tandogan T; The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Auffarth GU; The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. Gerd.Auffarth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
  • Son HS; The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Merz P; The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Choi CY; Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Khoramnia R; The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 21(1): 126, 2021 Mar 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33685428
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Glistenings describe small, refractile microvacuoles that may arise within the intraocular lens (IOL) material and reduce the patients' quality of vision. Lenses composed of hydrophobic acrylic material are particularly affected by glistening formation. In this study, we compared the tendency of glistening formation in six different types of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS:

We used a well-established accelerated laboratory method to develop glistenings in the following IOLs Vivinex XY1 (Hoya), AcrySof SN60WF (Alcon), Tecnis ZCB00 (AMO), Avansee PN6A (Kowa), Aktis SP NS-60YG (Nidek), and CT Lucia 601P (Zeiss). IOLs were first immersed in saline at 45 °C for 24 h and then at 37 °C for 2.5 h in a water bath. Microvacuole (MV) density and size (Miyata grading) were documented and calculated using an image analysis program.

RESULTS:

The mean glistening density [MV/mm2] and mean Miyata grading (in brackets) were Vivinex 11.6 ± 5.7 (0), SN60WF 264.4 ± 110.3 (2.6), Tecnis 6.0 ± 2.8 (0), Avansee 2.2 ± 0.7 (0), Aktis 851.4 ± 59.4 (3+) and CT Lucia 71.0 ± 71.6 (1).

CONCLUSIONS:

While all tested IOLs showed glistenings with the accelerated laboratory method, the Aktis and SN60WF showed the highest microvacuole density, followed by the CT Lucia. In comparison, the Vivinex, Tecnis, and Avansee IOLs showed far fewer number of glistenings.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resinas Acrílicas / Lentes Intraoculares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Ophthalmol Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resinas Acrílicas / Lentes Intraoculares Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Ophthalmol Assunto da revista: OFTALMOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha