Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cabezudo-García, Pablo; Mena-Vázquez, Natalia; Ciano-Petersen, Nicolás L; García-Martín, Guillermina; Estivill-Torrús, Guillermo; Serrano-Castro, Pedro J.
Afiliação
  • Cabezudo-García P; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
  • Mena-Vázquez N; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neurociencias, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
  • Ciano-Petersen NL; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
  • García-Martín G; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Reumatología, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
  • Estivill-Torrús G; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
  • Serrano-Castro PJ; Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neurociencias, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, 29010 Málaga, Spain.
Brain Sci ; 11(3)2021 Mar 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33808902
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology varies among studies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled global prevalence and the prevalence for each antibody.

METHODS:

A systematic search was conducted for studies that included prospectively patients ≥16 years old with epilepsy of unknown etiology and systematically determined neural autoantibodies. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled prevalence in total patients with a positive result for at least one neural autoantibody in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and for each autoantibody.

RESULTS:

Ten of the eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria and a total of 1302 patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology were included in themeta-analysis. The global pooled prevalence (IC95%) was 7.6% (4.6-11.2) in a total of 82 patients with a positive result for any neural autoantibody. None of the controls available in the studies had a positive result. Individual pooled prevalence for each autoantibody was glycine receptor (GlyR) (3.2%), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (1.9%), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (1.8%), leucine-rich glioma inactivated-1 protein (LGI1) (1.1%), contactin-2-associated protein (CASPR2) (0.6%) and onconeuronal (0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS:

The pooled prevalence of neural autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology is small but not irrelevant. None of the controls had a positive result. There was high heterogeneity among studies. In the future, a homogeneous protocol for testing neural autoantibodies is recommended.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha