Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Open vs closed surgical exposure of palatally displaced canines: a comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes-a multicentre, randomized controlled trial.
Björksved, Margitha; Arnrup, Kristina; Bazargani, Silvia Miranda; Lund, Henrik; Magnusson, Anders; Magnuson, Anders; Lindsten, Rune; Bazargani, Farhan.
Afiliação
  • Björksved M; Department of Orthodontics, Public Dental Health Service, Eskilstuna, Sweden.
  • Arnrup K; Postgraduate Dental Education Centre, Department of Orthodontics, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Bazargani SM; Dental Research Department, Public Dental Service, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Lund H; School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Magnusson A; Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Örebro, Sweden.
  • Magnuson A; Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Göteborg, Sweden.
  • Lindsten R; The Institute for Postgraduate Dental Education, Department of Orthodontics, Jönköping, Sweden.
  • Bazargani F; Statistician, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden.
Eur J Orthod ; 43(5): 487-497, 2021 10 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34114630
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare treatment time, patients' perceptions during orthodontic treatment, dental fear and side effects, between open and closed surgical exposures in patients with palatally displaced canines (PDCs). TRIAL

DESIGN:

Multicentre, randomized controlled trial, with random 11 allocation of two parallel groups. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

One hundred and twenty patients from three different orthodontic centres were randomized into one of the two intervention arms, open or closed surgical exposure. Both techniques had mucoperiosteal flaps raised and bone removed above the PDCs. In open exposure, tissue was removed above the canine, and glass ionomer - reaching above soft tissue - was built on the crown. The canine was then left to erupt spontaneously, prior to orthodontic alignment. At closed exposure, a chain was bonded to the canine and orthodontic traction was applied under the mucosa until eruption. Orthodontic alignment of the canines was undertaken after eruption into the oral cavity, with fixed appliances in both groups. All participants were treated according to intention to treat (ITT). BLINDING Due to the nature of this trial, only outcome assessors could be blinded to the intervention group.

RESULTS:

One hundred and seventeen patients completed the trial. All PDCs were successfully aligned. Total treatment time was equal in the two techniques, mean difference -0.1 months (95% CI -3.2 to 2.9, P = 0.93). The closed group experienced more pain and discomfort during the active orthodontic traction. Dental fear, root resorption and periodontal status did not show any clinically significant differences between the groups. GENERALIZABILITY Results of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) can be generalized only to a similar population aged 9-16 years, if exclusion criteria are met.

CONCLUSION:

The closed exposure group experienced more pain and discomfort mostly during active orthodontic traction. All other studied outcomes were similar between the two exposure groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT02186548 and Researchweb.org, ID 127201.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erupção Ectópica de Dente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Erupção Ectópica de Dente Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia