Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Genetic risk assessment for hereditary renal cell carcinoma: Clinical consensus statement.
Bratslavsky, Gennady; Mendhiratta, Neil; Daneshvar, Michael; Brugarolas, James; Ball, Mark W; Metwalli, Adam; Nathanson, Katherine L; Pierorazio, Phillip M; Boris, Ronald S; Singer, Eric A; Carlo, Maria I; Daly, Mary B; Henske, Elizabeth P; Hyatt, Colette; Middleton, Lindsay; Morris, Gloria; Jeong, Anhyo; Narayan, Vivek; Rathmell, W Kimryn; Vaishampayan, Ulka; Lee, Bruce H; Battle, Dena; Hall, Michael J; Hafez, Khaled; Jewett, Michael A S; Karamboulas, Christina; Pal, Sumanta K; Hakimi, A Ari; Kutikov, Alexander; Iliopoulos, Othon; Linehan, W Marston; Jonasch, Eric; Srinivasan, Ramaprasad; Shuch, Brian.
Afiliação
  • Bratslavsky G; Department of Urology, State University of New York (SUNY, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Mendhiratta N; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Daneshvar M; Department of Urology, State University of New York (SUNY, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Brugarolas J; Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Ball MW; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Metwalli A; Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
  • Nathanson KL; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Pierorazio PM; Division of Human Genetics and Translational Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Boris RS; Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Singer EA; Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Carlo MI; Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Daly MB; Section of Urologic Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
  • Henske EP; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Hyatt C; Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Middleton L; Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Morris G; Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Jeong A; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Texas (UT) Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Narayan V; Department of Urology, State University of New York (SUNY, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
  • Rathmell WK; Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Vaishampayan U; Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Lee BH; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Battle D; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Hall MJ; Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Hafez K; Driven To Cure, Silver Spring, Maryland.
  • Jewett MAS; The Kidney Cancer Research Alliance, Leesburg, Virginia.
  • Karamboulas C; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Pal SK; Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Hakimi AA; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Kutikov A; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Iliopoulos O; Department of Medical Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
  • Linehan WM; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Jonasch E; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Srinivasan R; Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Shuch B; Urologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Cancer ; 127(21): 3957-3966, 2021 Nov 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34343338
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is believed to have a strong hereditary component, there is a paucity of published guidelines for genetic risk assessment. A panel of experts was convened to gauge current opinions.

METHODS:

A North American multidisciplinary panel with expertise in hereditary RCC, including urologists, medical oncologists, clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, and patient advocates, was convened. Before the summit, a modified Delphi methodology was used to generate, review, and curate a set of consensus questions regarding RCC genetic risk assessment. Uniform consensus was defined as ≥85% agreement on particular questions.

RESULTS:

Thirty-three panelists, including urologists (n = 13), medical oncologists (n = 12), genetic counselors and clinical geneticists (n = 6), and patient advocates (n = 2), reviewed 53 curated consensus questions. Uniform consensus was achieved on 30 statements in specific areas that addressed for whom, what, when, and how genetic testing should be performed. Topics of consensus included the family history criteria, which should trigger further assessment, the need for risk assessment in those with bilateral or multifocal disease and/or specific histology, the utility of multigene panel testing, and acceptance of clinician-based counseling and testing by those who have experience with hereditary RCC.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the first ever consensus panel on RCC genetic risk assessment, 30 consensus statements were reached. Areas that require further research and discussion were also identified, with a second future meeting planned. This consensus statement may provide further guidance for clinicians when considering RCC genetic risk assessment. LAY

SUMMARY:

The contribution of germline genetics to the development of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has long been recognized. However, there is a paucity of guidelines to define how and when genetic risk assessment should be performed for patients with known or suspected hereditary RCC. Without guidelines, clinicians struggle to define who requires further evaluation, when risk assessment or testing should be done, which genes should be considered, and how counseling and/or testing should be performed. To this end, a multidisciplinary panel of national experts was convened to gauge current opinion on genetic risk assessment in RCC and to enumerate a set of recommendations to guide clinicians when evaluating individuals with suspected hereditary kidney cancer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renais / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Carcinoma de Células Renais / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article