Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Virtual reality-based neurological examination teaching tool(VRNET) versus standardized patient in teaching neurological examinations for the medical students: a randomized, single-blind study.
Han, Sang Gil; Kim, Young Dae; Kong, Tae Young; Cho, Junho.
Afiliação
  • Han SG; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YD; Department of Neurology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Kong TY; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho J; Department of Emergency Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. emjh@yuhs.ac.
BMC Med Educ ; 21(1): 493, 2021 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34526004
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The conventional methods for teaching neurological examination with real patients to medical students have some limitations if the patient with the symptom or disease is not available. Therefore, we developed a Virtual Reality-based Neurological Examination Teaching Tool (VRNET) and evaluated its usefulness in in teaching neurological examinations for the medical students.

METHODS:

In this prospective, randomized, single-blind study, we recruited 98 medical students and divided them into two groups 1) A standardized patient(SP) group that received the clinical performance examination utilizing standard patients complaining of dizziness was provided neurological findings using conventional method such as verbal description, photographs, and video clips; 2) A SP with VRNET group that was provided the neurological findings using the newly developed tool. Among the 98 students, 3 did not agree to participate, and 95 were enrolled in this study. The SP group comprised 39 students and the SP with VRNET group had 56 students.

RESULTS:

There were no statistical differences in VRNET's realness and student satisfaction between the SP and SP with VRNET groups. However, a statistically significant difference was found in the Neurologic Physical Exam (NPE) score (p = 0.043); the SP with VRNET group had higher NPE scores (3.81 ± 0.92) than the SP group (3.40 ± 1.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

VRNET is useful in teaching senior (graduating) medical students with SP with a neurologic problem.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Educação de Graduação em Medicina / Realidade Virtual Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Estudantes de Medicina / Educação de Graduação em Medicina / Realidade Virtual Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article