Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of intra-arterial chemotherapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
You, Chengyu; Li, Xianhui; Du, Yuelin; Wang, Hui; Zhang, Xiaojun; Wei, Tangqiang; Wang, Anguo.
Afiliação
  • You C; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Li X; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Du Y; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Wang H; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Zhang X; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Wei T; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
  • Wang A; Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
PeerJ ; 9: e12248, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34692255
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To summarize the current evidence on the effects of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) on high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and compare oncology results with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC).

METHODS:

We performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest by a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in February 2021. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The hazard radio (HR) with 95% CIs was used for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS:

A total of six studies with 866 patients were included. For IAC combined with IVC versus IVC alone, statistically significant differences were found regarding tumor recurrence rate (OR 0.51, 95% CI [0.36∼0.72], p = 0.0001), tumor progression rate (OR 0.47, 95% CI [0.30∼0.72], p = 0.0006), tumor-specific death rate (OR 0.49, 95% CI [0.25∼0.99], p = 0.05), PFS (HR 0.47, 95% CI [0.23∼0.96], p = 0.04) and RFS (HR 0.60, 95% CI [0.41∼0.87], p = 0.007). No significant difference between two groups was found for time to first recurrence (MD 3.27, 95% CI [-2.37∼8.92], p = 0.26) and OS (HR 1.20, 95% CI [0.44∼3.32], p = 0.72). For IAC alone versus IVC, There was no statistical difference in the terms of tumor-specific death rate (OR 0.67, 95% CI [0.29∼1.53], p = 0.34), RFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI [0.56∼1.46], p = 0.68) and PFS (HR 0.71, 95% CI [0.32∼1.55], p = 0.39). Adverse events mainly included nausea/vomiting (36.3%), hypoleukemia (19.4%), neutropenia (16.0%), increased creatinine (9.9%), increased alanine aminotransferase (18.7%), and thrombocytopenia (9.9%).

CONCLUSION:

The IAC combined with IVC is a safe and effective treatment for high risk NMIBC, with lower rates of recurrence, progression, tumor-specific death, PFS and RFS, and with minor and tolerable events. The effectiveness of the IAC alone is parallel to the IVC alone.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: PeerJ Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China