Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the Safety of a Novel Neonatal Anesthesia Protocol: A Review of 101 Patients With Early Cleft Lip Repair.
Wlodarczyk, Jordan R; Higuchi, Emma C; Liu, Alice; Urata, Marcus M; Gabreel, Waleed; Wolfswinkel, Erik M; Lau, Jennifer; Matar, Marla; Magee, William P; Urata, Mark M; Hammoudeh, Jeffrey A.
Afiliação
  • Wlodarczyk JR; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angele.
  • Higuchi EC; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Keck School of Medicine.
  • Liu A; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angele.
  • Urata MM; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angele.
  • Gabreel W; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Keck School of Medicine.
  • Wolfswinkel EM; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angele.
  • Lau J; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angele.
  • Matar M; Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
  • Magee WP; Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angele.
  • Urata MM; Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Hammoudeh JA; Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(8): 2682-2686, 2021.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34727471
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Our study introduces a novel anesthetic protocol for neonates without using volatile agents with the goal to minimize potentially neurotoxic and pro-apoptotic agents. The authors evaluated the short-term safety and efficacy of our anesthetic protocol in patients undergoing early cleft lip repair (ECLR).

METHODS:

A retrospective review of ECLR patients who underwent repair before 2.5 months of age within the last 4.3 years was performed. This sample was comprised of 2 groups, those who received either a standard volatile gas-based regimen or a dexmedetomidine-based neonatal anesthetic protocol (DBNAP). Patient demographics, medication dosing, anesthetic time (induction to extubation), major and minor complications, and medication side effects were compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS:

A total of 101 patients underwent ECLR. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2. Mean age at surgery was 31 ±â€Š13 days and mean anesthetic time was 179 ±â€Š36 minutes. DBNAP was used in 65 patients while the standard anesthetic protocol was used in 36 patients. Patient weight was significantly lower in the DBNAP group (4.01 ±â€Š0.61 versus 4.38 ±â€Š0.72 kg, P  = 0.007). There were no significant differences between the 2 cohorts when comparing anesthetic time, emergence time, complication rate, or medication side effects.

CONCLUSION:

For patients undergoing ECLR, DBNAP is perioperatively equivalent to the anesthetic standard of care, demonstrating no major complications and acceptable rates of minor complications and medication side effects.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenda Labial / Anestesia Dentária / Anestésicos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Child, preschool / Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fenda Labial / Anestesia Dentária / Anestésicos Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Child, preschool / Humans / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: J Craniofac Surg Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article