Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Development of a Systematic Review Protocol and a Scoping Review of Ultrasound-Induced Immune Effects in Peripheral Tumors.
Rix, Anne; Girbig, Renée; Porte, Céline; Lederle, Wiltrud; Leenaars, Cathalijn; Kiessling, Fabian.
Afiliação
  • Rix A; Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany. arix@ukaachen.de.
  • Girbig R; Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Porte C; Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Lederle W; Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen International University, Aachen, Germany.
  • Leenaars C; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Kiessling F; Department of Population Health Science, Unit Animals in Science and Society, Utrecht University, 3508 TD, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mol Imaging Biol ; 24(2): 288-297, 2022 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34845660
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Publication numbers reporting that ultrasound can stimulate immune reactions in tumors steadily increase. However, the presented data are partially conflicting, and mechanisms are difficult to identify from single publications. These shortcomings can be addressed by a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature. As a first step, we here present the methodology and protocol for a systematic review to answer the following research question Does ultrasound alter the immune reaction of peripheral solid tumors in humans and animals compared to control conditions without ultrasound? PROCEDURES We designed a protocol to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. The suitability of the protocol to detect and sort relevant literature was tested using a subset of publications. We extracted study characteristics, ultrasound parameters, and study outcomes to pre-evaluate the differences between publications and present the data as a scoping review.

RESULTS:

From 6532 publications detected by our preliminary literature search, 320 were selected for testing our systematic review protocol. Of the latter, 15 publications were eligible for data extraction. There, we found large differences between study characteristics (e.g., tumor type, age) and ultrasound settings (e.g., wavelength 0.5-9.5 MHz, acoustic pressure 0.0001-15,000 W/cm2). Finally, study outcomes included reports on cells of the innate (e.g., dendritic cells, macrophages) and adaptive immune system (e.g., CD8-/CD4-positive T cells).

CONCLUSION:

We designed a protocol to identify relevant literature and perform a systematic review and meta-analysis. The differences between extracted features between publications show the necessity for a comprehensive search and selection strategy in the systematic review to get a complete overview of the literature. Meta-analyses of the extracted outcomes can then enable evidence-based conclusions.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mol Imaging Biol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mol Imaging Biol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha