Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conformance of a 3T radiotherapy MRI scanner to the QIBA Diffusion Profile.
Carr, Madeline E; Keenan, Kathryn E; Rai, Robba; Boss, Michael A; Metcalfe, Peter; Walker, Amy; Holloway, Lois.
Afiliação
  • Carr ME; Centre for Medical and Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
  • Keenan KE; Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
  • Rai R; Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool, Australia.
  • Boss MA; Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, USA.
  • Metcalfe P; Medical Physics, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia.
  • Walker A; Department of Medical Physics, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool, Australia.
  • Holloway L; Institute of Medical Physics, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Med Phys ; 49(7): 4508-4517, 2022 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365884
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To assess the technical performance of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on a dedicated 3T radiotherapy scanner, using a standardized phantom and sequences. Investigations into factors that could impact the technical performance of ADC in the clinic were also completed, including changing the slice-encoded imaging direction and the reference sample ADC value.

METHODS:

ADC acquisitions were performed monthly on an isotropic diffusion phantom over 1 year. Measurements of ADC %bias, coefficients of variation for short-/long-term repeatability and precision (CVST /CVLT and CVP ), and b-value dependency (Depb ) were calculated. The measurements were then assessed according to the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Profile specifications.

RESULTS:

The average of all measurements over the year was within Profile recommended ranges. This included when testing was performed in different imaging directions, and on samples that had different ADC reference values (0.4-1.1 µm2 /ms). Results in the axial plane for the central water vial included a bias of +0.05%, CVST /CVLT /CVP  = 0.1%/ 0.9%/0.4% and Depb  = 0.4%.

CONCLUSIONS:

The technical performance of ADC on a radiotherapy dedicated MRI scanner over the course of 12 months was considered conformant to the QIBA Profile. Quantifying these metrics and factors that may affect the performance is essential in progressing the use of ADC clinically ensuring that the observed change of ADC in a tissue is due to a physiological response and not measurement variability.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália