Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Adapting user-centered design principles to improve communication of peer parent narratives on pediatric tracheostomy.
Yan, Haoyang; Kukora, Stephanie K; Pituch, Kenneth; Deldin, Patricia J; Arslanian-Engoren, Cynthia; Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
Afiliação
  • Yan H; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. haoyangy@umich.edu.
  • Kukora SK; Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N Michigan Avenue, 21st Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. haoyangy@umich.edu.
  • Pituch K; Department of Pediatrics, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Michigan Medicine, 1540 E Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Deldin PJ; Department of Pediatrics, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Michigan Medicine, 1540 E Hospital Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Arslanian-Engoren C; Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 22(1): 197, 2022 07 25.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35879768
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Parents who have to make tracheostomy decisions for their critically ill child may face forecasting errors and wish to learn from peer parents. We sought to develop an intervention with peer parent narratives to help parents anticipate and prepare for future challenges before making a decision.

METHODS:

To ensure that the intervention reflects parents' needs (rather than experts' opinions), we adapted a user-centered design (UCD) process to identify decision-critical information and refine the presentation format by interviewing parents who had tracheostomy decision making experience. Phase 1 (n = 10) presented 15 possible forecasting errors and asked participants to prioritize and justify the problematic ones. It also asked participants to comment on the draft narratives and preferred delivery mode and time of the intervention. Phase 2 (n = 9 additional parents and 1 previous parent) iteratively collected feedback over four waves of user interviews to guide revisions to the informational booklet.

RESULTS:

Phase 1 revealed that parents wanted information to address all forecasting errors as soon as tracheostomy becomes an option. They also highlighted diverse family situations and the importance of offering management strategies. The resulting prototype booklet contained five sections introduction, child's quality of life, home care, practical challenges, and resources. Feedback from Phase 2 focused on emphasizing individualized situations, personal choice, seriousness of the decision, and caregiver health as well as presenting concrete illustrations of future challenges with acknowledgement of positive outcomes and advice. We also learned that parents preferred to use the booklet with support from the care team rather than read it alone.

CONCLUSIONS:

A UCD process enabled inclusion of parental perspectives that were initially overlooked and tailoring of the intervention to meet parental expectations. Similar UCD-based approaches may be valuable in the design of other types of patient communications (e.g., decision aids).
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Design Centrado no Usuário Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Design Centrado no Usuário Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Assunto da revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos