Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of contact lenses for myopia control: Insights from a randomised, contralateral study design.
Weng, Rebecca; Lan, Weizhong; Bakaraju, Ravi; Conrad, Fabian; Naduvilath, Thomas; Yang, Zhi-Kuan; Sankaridurg, Padmaja.
Afiliação
  • Weng R; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Lan W; Aier Institute of Optometry and Vision Science, Changsha, China.
  • Bakaraju R; Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha, China.
  • Conrad F; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Naduvilath T; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Yang ZK; Brien Holden Vision Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Sankaridurg P; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 42(6): 1253-1263, 2022 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006761
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine the efficacy of two myopia control contact lenses (CL) compared with a single-vision (SV) CL.

METHODS:

Ninety-five Chinese children with myopia, aged 7-13 years in a 1-year prospective, randomised, contralateral, cross-over clinical trial with 3 groups; bilateral SVCL (Group I); randomised, contralateral wear of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) CL and SVCL (Group II) and MiSight® CL and SVCL (Group III). In Groups II and III, CL were crossed over at the 6-month point (Stage 1) and worn for a further 6 months (Stage 2). Group I wore SVCL during both stages. At baseline and the end of each stage, cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SE) and axial length (AL) were measured. Six-monthly ΔSE/ΔAL across groups was analysed using a linear mixed model (CL type, stage, eye and eye* stage included as factors). Intra-group paired differences between eyes were determined.

RESULTS:

In Group I, mean (SD) ΔSE/ΔAL with SVCL was -0.41 (0.28) D/0.13 (0.09) mm and -0.25 (0.27) D/0.16 (0.09) mm for stages 1 and 2, with a mean paired difference between eyes of 0.01 D/0.01 mm and 0.05 D/-0.01 mm, respectively. ΔSE/ΔAL with SVCL was similar across Groups I to III (Stage 1 p = 0.89/0.44, Stage 2 p = 0.70/ 0.64). In Groups II and III, ΔSE/ΔAL was lower with the EDOF and MiSight® CL than the contralateral SVCL in 68% to 94% of participants, and adjusted 6-month ΔSE/ΔAL with EDOF was similar to MiSight® (p = 0.49/0.56 for ΔSE/ΔAL, respectively). Discontinuations across the three groups were high, but not different between the groups (33.3%, 48.4% and 50% for Groups I to III, respectively [p = 0.19]) and most discontinuations occurred immediately after baseline.

CONCLUSIONS:

Extended depth of focus and MiSight® CL demonstrated similar efficacy in slowing myopia. When switched from a myopia control CL to SVCL, myopia progression was similar to that observed with age-matched wearers in SVCL and not suggestive of rebound.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas / Miopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas / Miopia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália