Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Occupational exposure and risk assessment for agricultural workers of thiamethoxam in vineyards.
Lee, Jiho; Kim, JiWoo; Shin, Yongho; Park, Eunyoung; Lee, Junghak; Keum, Young-Soo; Kim, Jeong-Han.
Afiliação
  • Lee J; Department of Crop Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim J; Forensic Genetics & Chemistry Division, Supreme Prosecutors' Office, Seoul 06590, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin Y; Department of Applied Biology, College of Natural Resources and Life Science, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Republic of Korea.
  • Park E; Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee J; Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
  • Keum YS; Department of Crop Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: kjh2404@snu.ac.kr.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf ; 243: 113988, 2022 Sep 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36029578
ABSTRACT
Dermal & inhalation exposure was examined and according to these results, risk assessment of agricultural workers to thiamethoxam was performed during pesticide mixing/loading and hand-held sprayer application (11 replicates, each of about 1000 L of spray suspension) in vineyards. For the whole body dosimetry (WBD), clothing (Outer and inner), gauze, and nitrile gloves were analyzed to determine dermal exposure using whole-body dosimetry exposure protocol. The inhalation exposure was measured using a glass fiber filter with an IOM sampler. Analytical method validation of exposure matrices was evaluated including the field recovery and breakthrough test. The dermal exposure amount during mixing/loading was 0.163 mg (0.0004% of the total mixed/loaded active ingredient [a.i.]), whereas there was no inhalation exposure. The gloves (0.154 mg, 94.5%) were the most exposed body parts followed by the chest and stomach (0.009 mg, 5.5%). During application, the dermal and inhalation exposure amounts were 32.3 mg (0.07% of the total applied a.i.) and 10.8 µg (2.4 × 10-6% of the total applied a.i), respectively. The shin (35.1%) had the highest exposure to pesticides, followed by the chest & stomach (15.6%) and pelvis (12.6%). In case of mixing/loading, the amounts of actual dermal exposure (ADE) and actual inhalation exposure (AIE) were 0.0 and 0.0 µg/day, while those of ADE and AIE were 4707.6 and 15.8 µg/day for application. In risk assessment of the two different scenarios, the risk index was much lower than 1 (mixing/loading0.000, application0.014), indicating that vineyard workers are at low risk of thiamethoxam exposure. To determine the validity of the risk assessment using WBD method, the urinary metabolite was analyzed. Comparison of biomonitoring data and WBD exposure data show a reliable correlation (r = 0.885, p = 0.0003), suggesting that these are suitable methods to estimate exposure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Praguicidas / Exposição Ocupacional Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Praguicidas / Exposição Ocupacional Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article