Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current opinions on DGF management practices: A survey of the United States and Canada.
Jadlowiec, Caroline C; Hippen, Benjamin; Gill, John; Heilman, Raymond; Stewart, Darren; Reddy, Kunam S; Mohan, Sumit; Wiseman, Alex; Cooper, Matthew.
Afiliação
  • Jadlowiec CC; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Hippen B; Global Medical Office, Fresenius Medical Care, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
  • Gill J; Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Heilman R; Division of Nephrology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Stewart D; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Reddy KS; Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
  • Mohan S; Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
  • Wiseman A; Division of Nephrology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Cooper M; Division of Transplant Surgery, MedStar Georgetown Transplant Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Clin Transplant ; 37(5): e14949, 2023 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36849704
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Significant center-to-center variation in attitudes and management of delayed graft function (DGF) remains common.

METHODS:

A survey to describe current DGF practices was developed by workgroup members sponsored by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and was distributed to both the NKF DGF workgroup members, kidney transplant program directors and the transplant community within the United States and Canada. Seventy-one percent of NKF workgroup members completed the survey along with 70 unique the United States and three Canadian kidney transplant programs. All Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions were represented.

RESULTS:

DGF was reported to occur at rate of 20%-40% for most centers with 3.9% indicating their incidence to be >60%. Most centers reported longer hospital lengths of stay and more frequent outpatient visits. Despite the commonality of DGF, only half of centers reported having an established protocol to manage DGF. Kidney allograft biopsies were the only consistent DGF management strategy observed, although use of machine perfusion was also heavily favored. Other DGF management strategies voiced by a minority included having established outpatient practices to care for DGF patients and administering outpatient community-based hemodialysis.

CONCLUSION:

Although approximately a third of survey responders indicated that risk of DGF played a role in their willingness to accept organs, most did not feel that increased cost or clinical impact on outcomes was a deterrent. Future strategies, including broader sharing of best practices, redefining terminology specific to DGF, the establishment of DGF dialysis guidelines and improving access to machine perfusion across OPOs may help reduce discard and improve utilization of kidneys at risk for DGF.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Rim Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Transplante de Rim / Rim Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Clin Transplant Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos