Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using augmented reality to guide bone conduction device implantation.
Lui, Justin T; Dahm, Valerie; Chen, Joseph M; Lin, Vincent Y; Irish, Jonathan C; Le, Trung N; Chan, Harley H L.
Afiliação
  • Lui JT; Section of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
  • Dahm V; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Chen JM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Lin VY; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Irish JC; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Le TN; Guided Therapeutics (GTx) Program, Techna Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
  • Chan HHL; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 7182, 2023 05 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37137995
ABSTRACT
Exact placement of bone conduction implants requires avoidance of critical structures. Existing guidance technologies for intraoperative placement have lacked widespread adoption given accessibility challenges and significant cognitive loading. The purpose of this study is to examine the application of augmented reality (AR) guided surgery on accuracy, duration, and ease on bone conduction implantation. Five surgeons surgically implanted two different types of conduction implants on cadaveric specimens with and without AR projection. Pre- and postoperative computer tomography scans were superimposed to calculate centre-to-centre distances and angular accuracies. Wilcoxon signed-rank testing was used to compare centre-to-centre (C-C) and angular accuracies between the control and experimental arms. Additionally, projection accuracy was derived from the distance between the bony fiducials and the projected fiducials using image guidance coordinates. Both operative time (4.3 ± 1.2 min. vs. 6.6 ± 3.5 min., p = 0.030) and centre-to-centre distances surgery (1.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 9.0 ± 5.3 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly less in augmented reality guided surgery. The difference in angular accuracy, however, was not significantly different. The overall average distance between the bony fiducial markings and the AR projected fiducials was 1.7 ± 0.6 mm. With direct intraoperative reference, AR-guided surgery enhances bone conduction implant placement while reduces operative time when compared to conventional surgical planning.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Realidade Aumentada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Realidade Aumentada Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá