Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Amputation Decreases Recurrent Symptomatic Neuroma Formation.
Goodyear, Evelyn G; O'Brien, Andrew L; West, Julie M; Huayllani, Maria T; Huffman, Allison C; Souza, Jason M; Schulz, Steven A; Moore, Amy M.
Afiliação
  • Goodyear EG; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • O'Brien AL; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • West JM; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • Huayllani MT; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • Huffman AC; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • Souza JM; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
  • Schulz SA; Vanguard Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.
  • Moore AM; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 153(1): 154-163, 2024 01 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37199690
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is an effective technique for the prevention and management of phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) among amputees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptomatic neuroma recurrence and neuropathic pain outcomes between cohorts undergoing TMR at the time of amputation (ie, acute) versus TMR following symptomatic neuroma formation (ie, delayed).

METHODS:

A cross-sectional, retrospective chart review was conducted using patients undergoing TMR between 2015 and 2020. Symptomatic neuroma recurrence and surgical complications were collected. A subanalysis was conducted for patients who completed Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity, interference, and behavior scales and an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) form.

RESULTS:

A total of 105 limbs from 103 patients were identified, with 73 acute TMR limbs and 32 delayed TMR limbs. Nineteen percent of the delayed TMR group had symptomatic neuromas recur in the distribution of original TMR compared with 1% of the acute TMR group ( P < 0.05). Pain surveys were completed at final follow-up by 85% of patients in the acute TMR group and 69% of patients in the delayed TMR group. Of this subanalysis, acute TMR patients reported significantly lower PLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05), RLP PROMIS pain intensity ( P < 0.05), and RLP PROMIS pain interference ( P < 0.05) scores in comparison to the delayed group.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients who underwent acute TMR reported improved pain scores and a decreased rate of neuroma formation compared with TMR performed in a delayed fashion. These results highlight the promising role of TMR in the prevention of neuropathic pain and neuroma formation at the time of amputation. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Membro Fantasma / Transferência de Nervo / Neuralgia / Neuroma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Membro Fantasma / Transferência de Nervo / Neuralgia / Neuroma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article