Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comprehensive, bed-side scoring system to predict difficult lumbar puncture.
Subramanian, Shobha; Reshma, B M; Salim Iqbal, M; Harsoor, S S.
Afiliação
  • Subramanian S; Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Gandhi Nagar, Kadugondanahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Reshma BM; Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Gandhi Nagar, Kadugondanahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Salim Iqbal M; Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Gandhi Nagar, Kadugondanahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
  • Harsoor SS; Department of Anesthesiology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College and Hospital, Gandhi Nagar, Kadugondanahalli, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol ; 39(1): 38-44, 2023.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37250250
ABSTRACT
Background and

Aims:

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is the most widely practiced neuraxial anesthesia. Lumbar puncture (LP) at multiple levels and multiple attempts due to any reason may cause discomfort and even serious complications. Hence the study was conducted to evaluate the patient variables that can predict difficult LP thus allowing for the use of alternate techniques. Material and

Methods:

We included 200 patients of ASA physical status I-II, scheduled to undergo elective infra-umbilical surgical procedures under spinal anesthesia. During preanesthetic evaluation, difficulty score was assessed using the 5 variables Age, abdominal circumference, spinal deformity - assessed as axial trunk rotation (ATR) value, anatomical spine assessed by spinous process landmark grading system (SLGS) and patient position, by assigning a score of 0- 3 for each variable, with a total score of 0 - 15. The difficulty of LP was graded as easy, moderate or difficult based on total number of attempts and spinal levels by independent experienced investigator. The scores obtained during preanesthetic evaluation and the data collected after performing LP were analyzed using multivariate analysis and P value noted.

Results:

Our study showed that above patient variables correlated well with difficult LP scoring (P < 0.001). SLGS was noted to be a strong predictor, while ATR value a weak predictor. The correlation between the total score and grades of SA had a positive association (R = 0.6832, P < 0.00001) and was statistically significant. A median difficulty score of 2, 5 and 8 predicted easy, moderate and difficult LP respectively.

Conclusion:

The scoring system provides for a useful tool to predict difficult LP and helps both patient and anesthesiologist to choose an alternative technique.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia