Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Initial glucocorticoid bridging in rheumatoid arthritis: does it affect glucocorticoid use over time?
van Ouwerkerk, Lotte; Verschueren, Patrick; Boers, Maarten; Emery, Paul; de Jong, Pascal Hendrik Pieter; Landewé, Robert Bm; Lems, Willem; Smolen, Josef S; Huizinga, Tom Wj; Allaart, Cornelia F; Bergstra, Sytske Anne.
Afiliação
  • van Ouwerkerk L; Rheumatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Verschueren P; Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Boers M; Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Emery P; Rheumatology, University of Leeds Faculty of Medicine and Health, Leeds, UK.
  • de Jong PHP; Rheumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Landewé RB; Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Lems W; Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
  • Smolen JS; Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Huizinga TW; Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Allaart CF; Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
  • Bergstra SA; Rheumatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 83(1): 65-71, 2024 Jan 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37607810
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To compare the use of glucocorticoids (GC) over time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were or were not treated initially with GC bridging therapy.

METHODS:

Data from the BeSt, CareRA and COBRA trials were combined in an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. We compared GC use between bridgers and non-bridgers at 12, 18 and 24 months from baseline with mixed-effects regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were mean cumulative GC dose until 24 months after baseline with and without the bridging period, Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints (DAS28) over time and number of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) changes.

RESULTS:

252/625 patients (40%) were randomised to GC bridging (bridgers). Excluding the period of bridging, later GC use was low in both groups and cumulative doses were similar. Mean DAS28 was similar between the groups, but bridgers improved more rapidly (p<0.001) in the first 6 months and the bridgers required significantly fewer changes in DMARDs (incidence rate ratio 0.59 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.94)). GC use was higher in the bridgers at t=12 months (OR 3.27 (95% CI 1.06 to 10.08)) and the bridging schedules resulted in a difference in cumulative GC dose of 2406 mg (95% CI 1403 to 3408) over 24 months.

CONCLUSION:

In randomised trials comparing GC bridging and no GC bridging, bridgers had a more rapid clinical improvement, fewer DMARD changes and similar late use of GC compared with non-bridgers. GC bridging per protocol resulted, as could be expected, in a higher cumulative GC dose over 2 years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Rheum Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Artrite Reumatoide / Antirreumáticos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Rheum Dis Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda