Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combined Surgery (Mommy-Makeover) Compared to Single Procedure (Abdominoplasty) in After-Pregnancy Women: A Prospective Study on Risks and Benefits.
Toto, Vito; Scarabosio, Anna; Alessandri-Bonetti, Mario; Albanese, Roberta; Persichetti, Paolo.
Afiliação
  • Toto V; Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
  • Scarabosio A; Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy. scarabosioanna@gmail.com.
  • Alessandri-Bonetti M; Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
  • Albanese R; Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy.
  • Persichetti P; Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 47(6): 2533-2542, 2023 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612475
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Mommy-makeover is becoming very popular to help them reshaping their own bodies and restoring self-perception, hardly stressed by childbearing-related changes. However, debate exists in the literature concerning safety and aesthetic outcome in patients undergoing combined procedures. The study aims to shed a light on advantages and disadvantages in mommy-makeover technique compared to conventional abdominoplasty with a particular attention to psychological aspects. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In total, 37 women were enrolled at Campus Bio-Medico Hospital in Rome between October 2019 and January 2022. All of the patients were eligible for both abdominoplasty only and mommy-makeover. We proposed to the patients both procedures explaining risks and benefits; then, based on the preference of the single patient, we performed either mommy-makeover (Group A) or abdominoplasty alone (Group B). In order to evaluate patients' satisfaction and safety, multiple questionnaires were administered 9-month postoperatively (BUT, POSAS, visual perception, etc.).

RESULTS:

The sample analyzed was composed of 37 patients (treatment group = 18, control group = 19). In the pre-post comparisons of BUT-A performed, there were statistically significant differences recorded in both groups and for all observed variables. The significance values were all less than 1% (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

Combined surgery proved not to be inferior in terms of patient safety. At the same time, the effectiveness in improving diastasis-related symptoms is fully comparable with single surgery. Treatment group showcases a considerable superiority in terms of body-image perception improvement and overall patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abdominoplastia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Aesthetic Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Abdominoplastia Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Aesthetic Plast Surg Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália