Influence of different calibration methods on surface electromyography-informed musculoskeletal models with few input signals.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although model personalization is critical when assessing individuals with morphological or neurological abnormalities, or even non-disabled subjects, its translation into routine clinical settings is hampered by the cumbersomeness of experimental data acquisition and lack of resources, which are linked to high costs and long processing pipelines. Quantifying the impact of neglecting subject-specific information in simulations that aim to estimate muscle forces with surface electromyography informed modeling approaches, can address their potential in relevant clinical questions. The present study investigates how different methods to fine-tune subject-specific neuromuscular parameters, reducing the number of electromyography input data, could affect the estimation of the unmeasured excitations and the musculotendon forces. METHODS: Three-dimensional motion analysis was performed on 8 non-disabled adult subjects and 13 electromyographic signals captured. Four neuromusculoskeletal models were created for 8 participants: a reference model driven by a large set of sEMG signals; two models informed by four electromyographic signals but calibrated in different fashions; a model based on static optimization. FINDINGS: The electromyography-informed models better predicted experimental excitations, including the unmeasured ones. The model based on static optimization obtained less reliable predictions of the experimental data. When comparing the different reduced models, no major differences were observed, suggesting that the less complex model may suffice for predicting muscle forces with a small set of input in clinical gait analysis tasks. INTERPRETATION: Quantitative model performance evaluation in different conditions provides an objective indication of which method yields the most accurate prediction when a small set of electromyographic recordings is available.