Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning in renal pathology.
Basso, Matthew Nicholas; Barua, Moumita; Meyer, Julien; John, Rohan; Khademi, April.
Afiliação
  • Basso MN; Image Analysis in Medicine Lab (IAMLAB), Department of Electrical, Computer, and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Barua M; Division of Nephrology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Meyer J; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • John R; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Khademi A; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Nephrol ; 2: 1007002, 2022.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37675000
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

When assessing kidney biopsies, pathologists use light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy to describe and diagnose glomerular lesions and diseases. These methods can be laborious, costly, fraught with inter-observer variability, and can have delays in turn-around time. Thus, computational approaches can be designed as screening and/or diagnostic tools, potentially relieving pathologist time, healthcare resources, while also having the ability to identify novel biomarkers, including subvisual features.

Methods:

Here, we implement our recently published biomarker feature extraction (BFE) model along with 3 pre-trained deep learning models (VGG16, VGG19, and InceptionV3) to diagnose 3 glomerular diseases using PAS-stained digital pathology images alone. The BFE model extracts a panel of 233 explainable features related to underlying pathology, which are subsequently narrowed down to 10 morphological and microstructural texture features for classification with a linear discriminant analysis machine learning classifier. 45 patient renal biopsies (371 glomeruli) from minimal change disease (MCD), membranous nephropathy (MN), and thin-basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN) were split into training/validation and held out sets. For the 3 deep learningmodels, data augmentation and Grad-CAM were used for better performance and interpretability.

Results:

The BFE model showed glomerular validation accuracy of 67.6% and testing accuracy of 76.8%. All deep learning approaches had higher validation accuracies (most for VGG16 at 78.5%) but lower testing accuracies. The highest testing accuracy at the glomerular level was VGG16 at 71.9%, while at the patient-level was InceptionV3 at 73.3%.

Discussion:

The results highlight the potential of both traditional machine learning and deep learning-based approaches for kidney biopsy evaluation.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Nephrol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Nephrol Ano de publicação: 2022 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá