Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
2023 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of nausea and vomiting following high-emetic-risk antineoplastic agents.
Herrstedt, Jørn; Celio, L; Hesketh, P J; Zhang, L; Navari, R; Chan, A; Saito, M; Chow, R; Aapro, M.
Afiliação
  • Herrstedt J; Department of Clinical Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Sygehusvej 10, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark. jherr@regionsjaelland.dk.
  • Celio L; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jherr@regionsjaelland.dk.
  • Hesketh PJ; , Milan, Italy.
  • Zhang L; Division of Hematology Oncology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
  • Navari R; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chan A; World Health Organization, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Saito M; Department of Clinical Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
  • Chow R; Department of Breast Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Aapro M; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 47, 2023 Dec 21.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38127246
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This systematic review updates the MASCC/ESMO recommendations for high-emetic-risk chemotherapy (HEC) published in 2016-2017. HEC still includes cisplatin, carmustine, dacarbazine, mechlorethamine, streptozocin, and cyclophosphamide in doses of > 1500 mg/m2 and the combination of cyclophosphamide and an anthracycline (AC) in women with breast cancer.

METHODS:

A systematic review report following the PRISMA guidelines of the literature from January 1, 2015, until February 1, 2023, was performed. PubMed (Ovid), Scopus (Google), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. The literature search was limited to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

RESULTS:

Forty-six new references were determined to be relevant. The main topics identified were (1) steroid-sparing regimens, (2) olanzapine-containing regimens, and (3) other issues such as comparisons of antiemetics of the same drug class, intravenous NK1 receptor antagonists, and potentially new antiemetics. Five updated recommendations are presented.

CONCLUSION:

There is no need to prescribe steroids (dexamethasone) beyond day 1 after AC HEC, whereas a 4-day regimen is recommended in non-AC HEC. Olanzapine is now recommended as a fixed part of a four-drug prophylactic antiemetic regimen in both non-AC and AC HEC. No major differences between 5-HT3 receptor antagonists or between NK1 receptor antagonists were identified. No new antiemetic agents qualified for inclusion in the updated recommendations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antieméticos / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Antieméticos / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2023 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca