Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Health literacy interventions for informal caregivers: systematic review.
Yuen, Eva; Wilson, Carlene; Adams, Joanne; Kangutkar, Tejashree; Livingston, Patricia M; White, Victoria M; Ockerby, Cherene; Hutchinson, Alison.
Afiliação
  • Yuen E; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia e.yuen@deakin.edu.au.
  • Wilson C; Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Adams J; School of Psychology and Public Health, LaTrobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
  • Kangutkar T; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
  • Livingston PM; Psycho-Oncology Research Unit, Olivia Newton-John Cancer, Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
  • White VM; Violet Vines Marshman Centre for Rural Health Research, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
  • Ockerby C; La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
  • Hutchinson A; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326015
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of the systematic review was to identify conceptual models and interventions designed to improve health literacy in caregivers of adults with a chronic disease/disability.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase were searched for relevant literature. Articles were included if they focused on adults who provided informal care to someone aged 18+ with a chronic disease/disability. Quantitative studies were included if they reported an intervention designed to improve caregiver health literacy (CHL) and assessed outcomes using a validated measure of health literacy. Qualitative and mixed method studies were included if they described a conceptual model or framework of CHL or developed/assessed the feasibility of an intervention. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Assessment Tool.

RESULTS:

Eleven studies were included. Five studies used pre-post design to assess outcomes of an intervention; four described intervention development and/or pilot testing; two described conceptual models. Two of five studies reported pre-post intervention improvements in CHL; one reported an improvement in one of nine health literacy domains; two reported no improvements following intervention. Interventions predominantly aimed to improve caregiver understanding of the disease, treatment and potential outcomes, day-to-day care, self-care and health provider engagement. Few interventions targeted broader interpersonal and health service factors identified as influencing CHL.

DISCUSSION:

Evidence on the development and assessment of comprehensive CHL interventions is scarce. Recommendations include the development of interventions that are guided by a CHL framework to ensure they address individual, interpersonal and health service/provider factors that influence CHL.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Support Palliat Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália