Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A meta-analysis of the efficacy of programmed cell death 1/its ligand inhibitors plus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.
Lin, Li; Xiao, Lu; Li, Lei; Chen, Chen; Zhang, Haorong; Yu, Changyan; Zhang, Lanfang; Wei, Anhua; Li, Wei.
Afiliação
  • Lin L; Department of Oncology, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Xiao L; Department of Rehabilitation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Li L; Department of Oncology, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Chen C; Department of Oncology, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Zhang H; Department of Oncology, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Yu C; Department of Oncology, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Zhang L; Department of Oncology, Wuhan Asia General Hospital, Wuhan, China.
  • Wei A; Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Li W; Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1267763, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38379896
ABSTRACT

Background:

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, have improved the therapeutic outcome for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of combination therapies, such as programmed cell death 1(PD-1)/its ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, in targeting different pathways remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether the addition of a CTLA-4 inhibitor to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy improves the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in NSCLC.

Methods:

We systematically searched various electronic databases for suitable trials. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 with and without CTLA-4 were included in the analyses. The meta-analysis software RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analyses.

Results:

A total of seven RCTs were retrieved. The results suggested that the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors did not show enhanced efficacy over PD1/PDL-1 inhibitor monotherapy as determined by overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.84-1.14, p = 0.79), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81-1.06, p = 0.25), and objective response rate (ORR) (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.96-1.21, p = 0.19). Furthermore, the combination immunotherapy was associated increased toxicity as evidenced by increased incidence of any type adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.00-1.13, p = 0.03), grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.36-1.82, p < 0.05), and treatment discontinuation (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.46-2.28, p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Combining anti-CTLA-4 with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy did not improve the therapeutic efficacy, and was associated with greater toxicity than anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigation of the combination immunotherapy in specific subsets of patients is warranted to identify and define the patient-specific benefits of this combination. Systematic Review Registration https//www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023435399.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol / Frontiers in pharmacology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol / Frontiers in pharmacology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China