Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative evaluation to determine the difficulty of No. 6 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy.
Takasu, Chie; Nishi, Masaaki; Yoshikawa, Kozo; Tokunaga, Takuya; Kashihara, Hideya; Wada, Yuma; Yoshimoto, Toshiaki; Shimada, Mitsuo.
Afiliação
  • Takasu C; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan. takasu.chie@tokushima-u.ac.jp.
  • Nishi M; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  • Yoshikawa K; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  • Tokunaga T; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  • Kashihara H; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  • Wada Y; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  • Yoshimoto T; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
  • Shimada M; Department of Surgery, University of Tokushima, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
BMC Surg ; 24(1): 69, 2024 Feb 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389108
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) requires a long learning curve because of the complicated surgical procedures. Infrapyloric (No. 6) lymph node dissection (LND) is one of the difficult procedures in LG, especially for trainees. This study investigated the impact of the prediction of the difficulty of No. 6 LND.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative computed tomography (CT) images and individual operative video records of 57 patients who underwent LG with No. 6 LND to define and predict the No. 6 LND difficulty. To evaluate whether prediction of the difficulty of No. 6 LND could improve surgical outcomes, 48 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy were assessed (30 patients without prediction by a qualified surgeon and 18 patients with prediction by a trainee).

RESULTS:

The anatomical characteristic that LND required > 2 cm of dissection along the right gastroepiploic vein was defined as difficulty of No. 6 LND. Of the 57 LG patients, difficulty was identified intraoperatively in 21 patients (36.8%). Among the several evaluated anatomical parameters, the length between the right gastroepiploic vein and the right gastroepiploic artery in the maximum intensity projection in contrast-enhanced CT images was significantly correlated with the intraoperative difficulty of No. 6 LND (p < 0.0001). Surgical outcomes, namely intraoperative minor bleeding, postoperative pancreatic fistula, and drain amylase concentration were not significantly different between LG performed by a trainee with prediction compared with that by a specialist without prediction.

CONCLUSIONS:

Preoperative evaluation of the difficulty of No. 6 LND is useful for trainees, to improve surgical outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Laparoscopia Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Japão