Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial.
Rob, Daniel; Farkasovska, Klaudia; Kreckova, Marketa; Smid, Ondrej; Kavalkova, Petra; Macoun, Jaromir; Huptych, Michal; Havrankova, Petra; Gallo, Juraj; Pudil, Jan; Dusik, Milan; Havranek, Stepan; Linhart, Ales; Belohlavek, Jan.
Afiliação
  • Rob D; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Farkasovska K; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Kreckova M; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Smid O; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Kavalkova P; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Macoun J; Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Huptych M; Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics (CIIRC), Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Havrankova P; Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Gallo J; Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Pudil J; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Dusik M; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Havranek S; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Linhart A; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
  • Belohlavek J; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic. jan.belohlavek@vfn.cz.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 125, 2024 04 16.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627823
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach.

METHODS:

The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment).

RESULTS:

From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8-7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reanimação Cardiopulmonar / Parada Cardíaca Extra-Hospitalar Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: República Tcheca