Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evolving assessment pathways for precision oncology medicines to improve patient access: a tumor-agnostic lens.
Radu, Priscila; Kumar, Gayathri; Cole, Amanda; Fameli, Aikaterini; Guthrie, Mark; Annemans, Lieven; Geissler, Jan; Italiano, Antoine; O'Rourke, Brian; Xoxi, Entela; Steuten, Lotte.
Afiliação
  • Radu P; Office of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kumar G; Office of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
  • Cole A; Office of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
  • Fameli A; Global Oncology Policy, GSK, London, United Kingdom.
  • Guthrie M; Global Access Strategy Oncology, Roche, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Annemans L; Department of Health Economics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Geissler J; Patvocates, Munich, Germany.
  • Italiano A; Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
  • O'Rourke B; ISPOR, Ottawa, Canada.
  • Xoxi E; Faculty of Economics, ALTEMS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Steuten L; Office of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
Oncologist ; 29(6): 465-472, 2024 Jun 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38630538
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Genomic and molecular alterations are increasingly important in cancer diagnosis, and scientific advances are opening new treatment avenues. Precision oncology (PO) uses a patient's genomic profile to determine optimal treatment, promising fewer side effects and higher success rates. Within PO, tumor-agnostic (TA) therapies target genomic alterations irrespective of tumor location. However, traditional value frameworks and approval pathways pose challenges which may limit patient access to PO therapies.

OBJECTIVES:

This study describes challenges in assessing PO and TA medicines, explores possible solutions, and provides actionable recommendations to facilitate an iterative life-cycle assessment of these medicines.

METHODS:

After reviewing the published literature, we obtained insights from key stakeholders and European experts across a range of disciplines, through individual interviews and an industry workshop. The research was guided and refined by an international expert committee through 2 sounding board meetings.

RESULTS:

The current challenges faced by PO and TA medicines are multiple and can be demonstrated through real-world examples of the current barriers and opportunities. A life-cycle approach to assessment should be taken, including key actions at the early stages of evidence generation, regulatory and reimbursement stage, as well as payment and adoption solutions that make use of the evolving evidence base. Working toward these solutions to maximize PO medicine value is a shared responsibility and stands to benefit all stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our call to action is to expand access to comprehensive genomic testing, foster a learning health care system, enable fast and equitable access to cost-effective treatments, and ultimately improve health outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina de Precisão / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Medicina de Precisão / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Oncologist Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido