Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Communicating visit information to family caregivers: How does method matter? A national survey.
Bratches, Reed W R; Freundlich, Noah Z; Odom, J Nicholas; O'Malley, A James; Barr, Paul J.
Afiliação
  • Bratches RWR; Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
  • Freundlich NZ; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Odom JN; Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
  • O'Malley AJ; School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Barr PJ; Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Palliat Support Care ; : 1-8, 2024 Apr 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654707
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The clinic visit is a critical point of contact for family caregivers. However, only 37% of family caregivers are able to accompany patients to visits. When they cannot attend, caregivers receive visit information to assist with their caregiving. However, little is known about how method of receiving information from clinic visits is associated with important caregiver outcomes. This study sought to determine whether mode of receiving clinic visit information (speaking with the patient, attending the visit, or using an after-visit summary [AVS]) was associated with changes in caregiver burden, caregiver preparedness, and the positive aspects of caregiving.

METHODS:

Cross-sectional web-based survey of a national sample of adult family caregivers. Multiple linear regression models determined associations between communication modes and caregivers' burden, preparedness, and positive aspects of caregiving, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates.

RESULTS:

Respondents (N = 340) were mostly male (58%), White (59%), ranged from 18 to 85 years old, and supported patients with conditions including diabetes, dementia, and cancer. Speaking with patients was associated with increases in positive aspects of caregiving (95% CI = 2.01, 5.42) and an AVS was associated with increases in positive aspects of caregiving (95% CI = 0.4, 3.56) and preparedness for caregiving (95% CI = 0.61, 3.15). Using any method of receiving information from visits was associated with the greatest increase in preparedness, compared to not receiving visit information. We did not observe an association between method of communication and caregiver burden. SIGNIFICANCE OF

RESULTS:

Method of communicating visit information is associated with improvements in caregiver preparedness and the positive aspects of caregiving, though caregiver burden may be unaffected by information exchange. Given the limitations of current communication methods, future work should explore directionality of the associations we found and identify visit communication strategies with caregivers that optimize caregiver and patient outcomes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Palliat Support Care Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Palliat Support Care Assunto da revista: TERAPEUTICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos