Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Effectiveness of Supervised and Home-Based Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Competitive Athletes.
Syed, Rehan Iftikhar Bukhari; Hangody, Laszlo Rudolf; Frischmann, Gergely; Kós, Petra; Kopper, Bence; Berkes, István.
Afiliação
  • Syed RIB; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Hangody LR; Department of Traumatology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Frischmann G; Biomechanics Lab, TSO Medical Hungary Kft., 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Kós P; Biomechanics Lab, TSO Medical Hungary Kft., 1118 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Kopper B; Department of Biomechanics, Hungarian University of Sports Science, 1123 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Berkes I; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
J Clin Med ; 13(8)2024 Apr 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673520
ABSTRACT

Background:

After the increasingly common anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedure in competitive athletes, rehabilitation is crucial for facilitating a timely return to sports (RTS) and preventing re-injury. This pilot study investigates the patient-reported outcomes of postoperative rehabilitation in competitive athletes, comparing supervised rehabilitation (SVR) and home-based rehabilitation (HBR).

Methods:

After ACLR, 60 (out of 74 screened) athletes were recruited and equally divided into HBR and SVR groups using non-probability convenience sampling, with each group comprising 15 males and 15 females. The rehabilitation outcomes in the respective groups were evaluated at 8 months using measures (Tegner Activity Scale [TAS], International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form [IKDC-SKF], ACL Return to Sport after Injury [ACL-RSI]) and objective parameters (isometric muscle strength, hamstring/quadricep asymmetry). RTS was evaluated at 9 months, with ACL re-injury rates recorded approximately 6 months post-RTS.

Results:

Both groups exhibited decreased TAS scores (HBR 8 to 6, SVR 8 to 7), with the SVR group demonstrating superior postoperative IKDC-SKF scores (81.82 vs. 68.43) and lower ACL-RSI scores (49.46 vs. 55.25). Isometric and isokinetic muscle strength, along with asymmetry values, was higher in the SVR group 8 months post-ACLR (p < 0.05). The SVR group showed a higher RTS rate to the same level (76.6% vs. 53.3%), while the re-injury rate was the same in both the rehabilitation groups (3.3%).

Conclusions:

Although both rehabilitation approaches yielded comparable outcomes, SVR may demonstrate some superior biomechanical improvements in athletes, resulting in a higher RTS rate. However, the psychological outcomes and re-injury rates did not significantly differ between the groups, emphasizing the need to address individual psychological needs during rehabilitation. Further investigation is recommended with a larger sample size to address the differences of gender among competitive athletes.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Hungria