Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Higher infection risk for JAK inhibitors tofacitinib and baricitinib compared to subcutaneous biological DMARDs.
Opdam, M A A; Broeder, N den; van den Bemt, B J F; Mulder, K; van de Wiel, K M; van Ballegooijen, H; van Crevel, R; den Broeder, A A.
Afiliação
  • Opdam MAA; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Antwoordnummer 2237, 6500 WC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. M.Opdam@maartenskliniek.nl.
  • Broeder ND; Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Antwoordnummer 2237, 6500 WC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van den Bemt BJF; Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.
  • Mulder K; Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van de Wiel KM; IQVIA Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Ballegooijen H; IQVIA Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Crevel R; IQVIA Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • den Broeder AA; Department of Infectious Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(6): 2133-2138, 2024 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703283
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is usually treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and more recently, Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). Randomized trials suggest similar infection risks for JAKi and bDMARDs, but real-world data are scarce.

METHODS:

From a nationally representative prescription database, adult RA patients starting a new JAKi or bDMARD between August 1st, 2018, and January 31st, 2021, were included. Prescriptions of antibiotic, antiviral or antifungal medication were used as proxy for infections. Infection incidence rates (IR) were compared between JAKi and bDMARDs and infection risks were estimated using multilevel Poisson regression adjusted for follow-up time and potential confounders and stratified for age < 65 and ≥ 65 years.

RESULTS:

In 14,989 patients, we identified 20,050 treatment episodes with either JAKi or bDMARDs. The infection IR was significantly higher in JAKi (48/100 patient years) compared bDMARDs (35/100 patient years, adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33). More herpes zoster infections were seen in JAKi compared to bDMARDs (adjusted IRR 2.65, 95% CI 1.94-3.60). No significant differences in infection IRs were found comparing JAKi baricitinib and tofacitinib. In older patients, infection IRs were higher, but IRRs were similar between age groups.

CONCLUSION:

In comparison to bDMARDs, JAKi are associated with a slightly higher infection risk and a higher risk of herpes zoster specifically. In older patients, infection IRs are higher but similar infection risks for JAKi and bDMARDs are observed. No differences in infection risk between tofacitinib and baricitinib were found. Key Points • Compared to bDMARDs, JAKi are associated with a slightly higher infection risk for all ages • An increased risk of herpes zoster in patients who use JAK inhibitors was confirmed • No significant differences in infection incidence were found between tofacitinib and baricitinib.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piperidinas / Artrite Reumatoide / Purinas / Pirazóis / Pirimidinas / Sulfonamidas / Azetidinas / Antirreumáticos / Inibidores de Janus Quinases Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rheumatol / Clin. rheumatol / Clinical rheumatology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piperidinas / Artrite Reumatoide / Purinas / Pirazóis / Pirimidinas / Sulfonamidas / Azetidinas / Antirreumáticos / Inibidores de Janus Quinases Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Rheumatol / Clin. rheumatol / Clinical rheumatology Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda