Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of an opioid-free anesthetic on postoperative opioid consumption after laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Perez, Josiah Joco; Strunk, Joseph D; Preciado, Octavio M; DeFaccio, Rian J; Chang, Lily C; Mallipeddi, Mohan K; Deal, Shanley B; Oryhan, Christine L.
Afiliação
  • Perez JJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Strunk JD; Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Preciado OM; Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • DeFaccio RJ; Private Practice, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Chang LC; Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Mallipeddi MK; Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Deal SB; Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  • Oryhan CL; Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA christine.oryhan@virginiamason.org.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 2024 Jun 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839427
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Opioid administration has the benefit of providing perioperative analgesia but is also associated with adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) may reduce postoperative opioid consumption and adverse effects after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. In this randomized controlled study, we hypothesized that an opioid-free anesthetic using lidocaine, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine would result in a clinically significant reduction in 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption when compared with an opioid-inclusive technique.

METHODS:

Subjects presenting for laparoscopic or robotic bariatric surgery were randomized in a 11 ratio to receive either standard opioid-inclusive anesthesia (group A control) or OFA (group B OFA). The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, patient-reported incidence of opioid-related adverse effects, hospital length of stay, patient satisfaction, and ongoing opioid use at 1 and 3 months after hospital discharge.

RESULTS:

181 subjects, 86 from the control group and 95 from the OFA group, completed the study per protocol. Analysis of the primary outcome showed no significant difference in total opioid consumption at 24 hours between the two treatment groups (control 52 OMEs vs OFA 55 OMEs, p=0.49). No secondary outcomes showed statistically significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates that an OFA protocol using dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and lidocaine for laparoscopic or robotic bariatric surgery was not associated with a reduction in 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption when compared with an opioid-inclusive technique using fentanyl.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Reg Anesth Pain Med Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Reg Anesth Pain Med Assunto da revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos