Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with or without rectus sheath block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.
Yoon, Jung-Pil; Kim, Hee Young; Jung, Jieun; Lee, Jimin; Park, Seyeon; Byeon, Gyeong-Jo.
Afiliação
  • Yoon JP; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Geumoro 20, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HY; Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung J; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Geumoro 20, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee J; Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
  • Park S; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Geumoro 20, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.
  • Byeon GJ; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Geumoro 20, Yangsan, Gyeongnam, 50612, Republic of Korea.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 203, 2024 Jun 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38851689
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores.

METHODS:

The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS:

There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary

outcomes:

the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events.

CONCLUSION:

Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Músculos Abdominais / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Ropivacaina / Bloqueio Nervoso Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor Pós-Operatória / Colecistectomia Laparoscópica / Músculos Abdominais / Ultrassonografia de Intervenção / Ropivacaina / Bloqueio Nervoso Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Anesthesiol Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article