Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating the Mechanical Strength of Three Dimensionally (3D) Printed Implants in Septorhinoplasty through Finite Element Analysis (FEA).
Syamal, Sujata; Taritsa, Iulianna C; Alvarez, Angelica Hernandez; Schuster, Kirsten; Foppiani, Jose; Kaplan, David; Lin, Samuel J.
Afiliação
  • Syamal S; Division of Continuing Education, Harvard University Extension School Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
  • Taritsa IC; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Alvarez AH; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Schuster K; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Foppiani J; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Kaplan D; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
  • Lin SJ; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 2024 Jun 24.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38923894
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Autologous nasoseptal cartilage grafts are used to correct nasal asymmetry and deviation in rhinoplasty, but patients who have undergone multiple surgeries may have limited autologous cartilage tissue available. 3D-printed L-strut implants may address these challenges in the future, but their mechanical strength is understudied. Silk fibroin-gelatin (SFG), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polylactide (PLA) are bio-inks known for their strength. We present Finite Element Analysis (FEA) models comparing the mechanical strength of 3D-printed SFG, PCL, and PLA implants with nasoseptal cartilage grafts when autologous or allografts are not available.

METHODS:

FEA models compared the stress and deformation responses of 3D-printed solid and scaffold implant replacements to cartilage. To simulate a daily force from overlying soft tissue, a unidirectional load was applied at the "keystone" region given its structural role and compared with native cartilaginous properties.

RESULTS:

3D-printed solid SFG, PCL, and PLA and scaffold PCL and PLA models demonstrated lower deformations compared to cartilage. Solid SFG balanced strength and flexibility. The maximum stress was below all materials' yield stresses suggesting their deformations are unlikely permanent under a daily load.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our FEA models suggest that 3D-printed L-strut implants carry promising mechanical strength. Solid SFG's results mimicked cartilage's mechanical behavior. Thus, scaffold SFG merits further geometric optimization for potential use for cartilage substitution. 3D-printed septal cartilage replacement implants can potentially enhance surgical management of patients who lack available donor cartilage in select settings. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Computational simulations can evaluate 3D-printed implant strength and their potential to replace septal cartilage in septorhinoplasty.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos