Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Routine Versus Selective Distal Perfusion Catheter Use in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
Buda, Kevin G; Robinson, Emilie C; Titus, Jessica; Eckman, Peter M; Chavez, Ivan; Cravero, Ellen; Stanberry, Larissa; Hryniewicz, Katarzyna.
Afiliação
  • Buda KG; From the Cardiology Division, Allina Health - Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Robinson EC; Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Titus J; Department of Vascular Surgery, Ascension Illinois Heart & Vascular, Chicago, Illinois.
  • Eckman PM; Department of Vascular Surgery, Essentia Health, Duluth, Minnesota.
  • Chavez I; From the Cardiology Division, Allina Health - Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Cravero E; From the Cardiology Division, Allina Health - Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Stanberry L; Cardiology Division, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
  • Hryniewicz K; Cardiology Division, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
ASAIO J ; 2024 Jul 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38941597
ABSTRACT
Although current studies support the use of prophylactic distal perfusion catheters (DPCs) to decrease limb ischemia in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), methods for monitoring limb ischemia differ between studies. We evaluated the safety of a selective rather than prophylactic DPC strategy at a single center with a well-established protocol for limb ischemia monitoring. Distal perfusion catheters were placed selectively if there was evidence of hypoperfusion at any point until decannulation. All patients were followed daily by vascular surgery with continuous regional saturation monitoring. Of 188 patients supported with VA ECMO, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between patients with upfront, delayed, and no DPC. Thirty day mortality was highest in patients with an upfront DPC (56% in the upfront DPC group, 19% in the delayed DPC group, and 22% in the no-DPC group, p < 0.001). The incidence of major bleeding, fasciotomy, and amputation in the entire cohort was 3.7%, 3.7%, and 0%, respectively. With strict adherence to a protocol for limb ischemia monitoring, a selective rather than prophylactic DPC strategy is safe and may obviate the risks of an additional arterial catheter.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ASAIO J Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: ASAIO J Assunto da revista: TRANSPLANTE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article