Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Controversies in endobronchial ultrasound.
Dietrich, Christoph F; Bugalho, Antonio; Carrara, Silvia; Clementsen, Paul Frost; Dong, Yi; Hocke, Michael; Kolekar, Shailesh Balasaheb; Konge, Lars; Ignee, André; Löwe, Axel; Jenssen, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Dietrich CF; Department Allgemeine Innere Medizin (DAIM), Kliniken Hirslanden Beau Site, Salem and Permancence, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Bugalho A; Pulmonology Department, CUF Tejo Hospital and CUF Descobertas Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Carrara S; Comprehensive Health Research Centre, Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
  • Clementsen PF; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital - Endoscopic Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Dong Y; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hocke M; Respiratory Research Unit PLUZ, Zealand University Hospital Roskilde/Naestved, Denmark.
  • Kolekar SB; Department of Ultrasound, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Konge L; Medical Department II, Helios Klinikum Meiningen, Meiningen, Germany.
  • Ignee A; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Löwe A; Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Respiratory Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Jenssen C; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Endosc Ultrasound ; 13(1): 6-15, 2024.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947115
ABSTRACT
Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a minimally invasive highly accurate and safe endoscopic technique for the evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy and mediastinal masses including centrally located lung tumors. The combination of transbronchial and transoesophageal tissue sampling has improved lung cancer staging, reducing the need for more invasive and surgical diagnostic procedures. Despite the high level of evidence regarding EBUS use in the aforementioned situations, there are still challenges and controversial issues such as follows Should informed consent for EBUS and flexible bronchoscopy be different? Is EBUS able to replace standard bronchoscopy in patients with suspected lung cancer? Which is the best position, screen orientation, route of intubation, and sedation/anesthesia to perform EBUS? Is it advisable to use a balloon in all procedures? How should the operator acquire skills and how should competence be ensured? This Pro-Con article aims to address these open questions.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endosc Ultrasound Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endosc Ultrasound Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça