Diagnostic process of cancer in a health system without gatekeeping: a single centre survey analysis.

INTRODUCTION: It is essential to increase the rates of early diagnosis in cancer control, and the diagnostic process needs to be improved to achieve this goal. Previous studies showed that in countries where there is a gatekeeping system, there might be a delay in cancer diagnosis. Our aim is to examine the process of cancer diagnosis in a healthcare system without gatekeeping. METHOD: A quantitative descriptive study has been conducted in various outpatient clinics of Pendik Training and Research Hospital, between 1 February and 31 May 2019, with individuals aged over 18 and diagnosed with cancer in the last six months. The data was collected through a questionnaire filled in by face-to-face interview method. Patient's socio-economic characteristics, their symptoms at the time of the diagnosis and the diagnosis process were questioned. RESULT: The median diagnostic interval was 30 days (min-max 1-365), and the median patient interval was 60 (1-600) days. Patients pointed out that the diagnostic tests, especially the pathology reporting process, caused the diagnostic interval to be prolonged. Of the patients, 84% (n 135) stated that they did not consider their symptoms as a sign of serious illness. The patient interval was shortest with symptoms of haematuria and haematochezia and longest with dysuria and change in bladder habit. DISCUSSION: The study examined the diagnosis process in our health system, where patients can apply for health services at any stage. The results showed that there were no superior outcomes to those observed in primary care-led health systems. Patients reported that waiting times for medical tests led to prolongation of the diagnosis time. Cancer awareness of patients should also be increased to shorten patient admission times.

Exploring why European primary care physicians sometimes do not think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: While primary care physicians (PCPs) play a key role in cancer detection, they can find cancer diagnosis challenging, and some patients have considerable delays between presentation and onward referral. AIM: To explore European PCPs' experiences and views on cases where they considered that they had been slow to think of, or act on, a possible cancer diagnosis. DESIGN & SETTING: A multicentre European qualitative study, based on an online survey with open-ended questions, asking PCPs for their narratives about cases when they had missed a diagnosis of cancer. METHOD: Using maximum variation sampling, PCPs in 23 European countries were asked to describe what happened in a case where they were slow to think of a cancer diagnosis, and for their views on why it happened. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: A total of 158 PCPs completed the questionnaire. The main themes were as follows: patients' descriptions did not suggest cancer; distracting factors reduced PCPs' cancer suspicions; patients' hesitancy delayed the diagnosis; system factors not facilitating timely diagnosis; PCPs felt that they had acted wrongly; and problems with communicating adequately. CONCLUSION: The study identified six overarching themes that need to be addressed. Doing so should reduce morbidity and mortality in the small proportion of patients who have a significant, avoidable delay in their cancer diagnosis. The 'Swiss cheese' model of accident causation showed how the themes related to each other.

What factors empower general practitioners for early cancer diagnosis? A 20-country European Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND: Some symptoms are recognised as red flags for cancer, causing the General Practitioner (GP) to refer the patient for investigation without delay. However, many early symptoms of cancer are vague and unspecific, and in these cases, a delay in referral risks a diagnosis of cancer that is too late. Empowering GPs in their management of patients that may have cancer is likely to lead to more timely cancer diagnoses. AIM: To identify the factors that affect European GPs' empowerment in making an early diagnosis of cancer. METHODS: This was a Delphi study involving GPs in 20 European countries. We presented GPs with 52 statements representing factors that could empower GPs to increase the number of early cancer diagnoses. Over three Delphi rounds, we asked GPs to indicate the clinical relevance of each statement on a Likert scale.The final list of statements indicated those that were considered by consensus to be the most relevant. RESULTS: In total, 53 GPs from 20 European countries completed the Delphi process, out of the 68 GPs who completed round one. Twelve statements satisfied the pre-defined criteria for relevance. Five of the statements related to screening and four to the primary/secondary care interface. The other selected statements concerned information technology (IT) and GPs' working conditions. Statements relating to training, skills and working efficiency were not considered priority areas. CONCLUSION: GPs consider that system factors relating to screening, the primary-secondary care interface, IT and their working conditions are key to enhancing their empowerment in patients that could have cancer. These findings provide the basis for seeking actions and policies that will support GPs in their efforts to achieve timely cancer diagnosis.

The effect of an Empowerment-Based Human Centered Educational Program on early weaning.

AIM: To determine the effects of an Empowerment-Based Human Centered Educational Program on early weaning. BACKGROUND: Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) means that the infant receives only breast milk during the first six months of life. It is essential for the healthy growth of the infants and is supported by the main health organizations all around the world. Intervention studies performed within the antenatal period suggest that the education extends the duration of breastfeeding and increases the frequency of EBF. METHODS: This is a semi-randomized control study. An interactive training module including role-plays which contain traditional patterns, short films, short presentations, and group practice with models was prepared. The participants were recruited in the study based on the voluntary participation of pregnant women followed up for antenatal care in a total of four family health centers in Pendik, a district of Istanbul. The pregnant women of one center formed the control group while others constituted the intervention group. All of them were certified as "Baby Friendly" institution. A pretest and a posttest have been performed to measure breastfeeding knowledge in the intervention group. The mothers of the intervention group have been randomized into two subgroups: one group for reminder call and the other for routine follow-up. All the participants including control group were called at the end of the postpartum sixth month to determine the rates of EBF. RESULTS: Statistically significant increase in the rates of EBF at the end of six months showed the effectiveness of the education module (42.9 versus 22.2%, P = 0.001). Supplementary food taking time was earlier in the control group (18.5 ± 8 versus 15 ± 9.5 week, P = 0.03). The main reason of early weaning reported by the mothers was "the insufficiency of the mother's milk." CONCLUSION: The group training and postnatal reminders were found to be more effective than the individual training provided at the baby-friendly health institutions in terms of the effectiveness on increasing the frequency of EBF.

The prevalence of performance-related musculoskeletal disorders in fine arts faculty students and academics.

BACKGROUND: While professional musicians may have a high incidence of musculoskeletal pain, there are few studies on the performance-related musculoskeletal disorders (PRMD) in visual artists. OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence and probable risk factors of PRMD in visual artists. METHODS: The study population comprised the students and academics of fine arts faculty. The Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaires were used to evaluate posture and pain, respectively. RESULTS: The study included 197 participants (140 women, 57 men). The mean REBA score was 5.2. The sculptors who worked in marble sculpting had the highest REBA scores. Of the participants, 88.8% reported musculoskeletal pain. The pain severity of 64.0% of the participants was 3 (very uncomfortable with a reduction in activity) and/or 4 (pain interferes with the ability to work). The PRMD prevalence was 64.0%, and significantly higher in women than in men (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal pain in visual artists is extremely prevalent. Mean REBA score of 5.2 corresponds to a medium risk assessment accompanied by guidance to "further investigate, change soon." The policy makers in fine arts faculties who are responsible for student and employee health should prioritize strategies to prevent and manage musculoskeletal pain.