Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Artif Organs ; 48(6): 665-674, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551363

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As the pandemic progressed, the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome increased, and patient triage and transfer to ECMO centers became important to optimize patient outcomes. Our objectives are to identify predictors of patient transfer for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) evaluation as well as to describe the outcomes of accepted patients. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of V-V ECMO transfer requests for adult patients with known or suspected COVID-19 and respiratory failure from March 2020 until March 2021. Data were collected prospectively during the triage process for transfer requests as part of clinical patient care at our institution. RESULTS: Of 341 referred patients, 112 (33%) were accepted for transfer to our facility, whereas 229 (67%) patients were declined for transfer. The Classification and Regression Tree analysis showed that patients' high pressure during airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and age were the variables most significantly associated with the decision to accept or decline patients for transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Our triage process enabled one-third of referred patients to be transferred for evaluation, with nearly 70% of those patients ultimately receiving ECMO support. High ventilator settings on APRV and young age were associated with acceptance for transfer. Accepted patients also had a higher incidence of adjunctive therapies (proning and paralysis) prior to transfer request, less cardiac or renal dysfunction, and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. Further research is warranted to investigate the outcomes of nontransferred patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Insuficiência Respiratória , Triagem , Humanos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Triagem/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Insuficiência Respiratória/terapia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso , Transferência de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/terapia , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/virologia
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39287672

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is recognized as one of the most prevalent malignancies, both in terms of incidence and mortality rates. Current research into CRC has shed light on the molecular mechanisms driving its development. Several factors, including lifestyle, environmental influences, genetics, and diet, play significant roles in its pathogenesis. Natural compounds such as curcumin, tanshinone, lycorine, sinomenine, kaempferol, verbascoside, quercetin, berberine, and fisetin have shown great promise in the prevention and treatment of CRC. Research has also highlighted the significance of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in CRC. Among these, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been found to regulate the transcription of genes involved in cancer. LncRNAs contribute to cancer stem cell (CSC) proliferation, angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and chemoresistance. Specific lncRNAs, including GAS5, LNC00337, HOTAIR, TPT1-AS1, cCSC1, BCAR4, TUG1, and Solh2, play crucial roles in these processes. They hold potential as novel biomarkers, detectable in bodily fluids and tissues, and could serve as therapeutic targets due to their involvement in drug resistance and sensitivity. These insights could improve CRC treatment strategies, addressing resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current knowledge regarding the effectiveness of natural anti-cancer agents in CRC treatment. Additionally, it offers an in-depth evaluation of lncRNAs in CRC, their role in the disease's progression, and their potential applications in its management.

3.
Pathol Res Pract ; 253: 155044, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141573

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent cancers in incidence and mortality. Despite advances in cancer biology, molecular genetics, and targeted treatments, CRC prognosis and survival have not kept pace. This is usually due to advanced staging and metastases at diagnosis. Thus, great importance has been placed upon understanding the molecular pathophysiology behind the development of CRC, which has highlighted the significance of non-coding RNA's role and associated intracellular signaling pathways in the pathogenesis of the disease. According to recent studies, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA), a subtype of ncRNAs whose length exceeds 200 nucleotides, have been found to have regulatory functions on multiple levels. Their actions at the transcription, post-transcriptional, translational levels, and epigenetic regulation have made them prime modulators of gene expression. Due to their role in cellular cancer hallmarks, their dysregulation has been linked to several illnesses, including cancer. Furthermore, their clinical relevance has expanded due to their possible detection in blood which has cemented them as potential future biomarkers and thus, potential targets for new therapy. This review will highlight the importance of lncRNAs and related signaling pathways in the development of CRC and their subsequent clinical applications.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , RNA Longo não Codificante , Humanos , RNA Longo não Codificante/genética , Epigênese Genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , RNA não Traduzido/genética , Transdução de Sinais/genética , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/genética
4.
Cureus ; 14(11): e31102, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36475187

RESUMO

Background When obstetric patients present to a hospital without obstetric consultants for medical care, they are often transferred for a higher level of care. Factors associated with patient care during transport between hospitals are unknown. Our study investigated factors associated with care intensity. Methods We retrospectively reviewed charts from peripartum adult patients who were transported to our academic quaternary center between January 1, 2012, and April 19, 2020. We excluded patients transported for gynecologic or fetus-related complications. We defined any transport interventions as any ventilator management, any titration of continuous infusions, and any continuation or initiation of medication during transport. Results We included 126 patients, and the mean age (SD) was 29 (7) years. There were 87 (695) antepartum patients, with nine (7%) requiring mechanical ventilation. Of the patients, 98 (78%) received at least one intervention during transport. Transport time (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.001-1.06, P = 0.040), preeclampsia (OR: 3.8, 95% CI: 1.1-12.7, P = 0.030), and any obstetric hemorrhage (OR: 8.3, 95% CI: 1.03-68, P = 0.047), either antepartum or postpartum, were associated with higher likelihood of receiving any intervention. Conclusions Peripartum patients often received interventions during transport. Preeclampsia and hemorrhage were associated with the likelihood of interventions. Transport clinicians should be prepared when transporting these patients. Further studies are needed to confirm our observations.

5.
J Emerg Trauma Shock ; 15(3): 128-134, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36353407

RESUMO

Introduction: Patients who develop occult septic shock (OSS) are associated with worse outcomes than those with early septic shock (ESS). Patients with skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) may have underlying organ dysfunction due to OSS, yet the prevalence and the outcomes of patients with SSTI and early versus occult shock have not been described. This study compared the clinical characteristics of SSTI patients and the prevalence of having no septic shock (NSS), ESS, or OSS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed charts of adult patients who were transferred from any emergency department to our academic center between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. Outcomes of interest were the development of OSS and acute kidney injury (AKI). We performed logistic regressions to measure the association between clinical factors with the outcomes and created probability plots to show the relationship between key clinical variables and outcomes of OSS or AKI. Results: Among 269 patients, 218 (81%) patients had NSS, 16 (6%) patients had ESS, and 35 (13%) patients had OSS. Patients with OSS had higher mean serum lactate concentrations than patients with NSS (3.5 vs. 2.1 mmol/L, P < 0.01). Higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was associated with higher likelihood of developing OSS (odds ratio [OR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.62, P < 0.001). NSS was associated with very low odds of developing AKI (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.33, P < 0.001). Conclusions: 13% of the patients with SSTI developed OSS. Patients with OSS had elevated serum lactate concentration and higher SOFA score than those with NSS. Increased SOFA score is a predictor for the development of OSS.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA