Pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for neuropathic pain: Systematic review and French recommendations.

Neuropathic pain remains a significant unmet medical need. Several recommendations have recently been proposed concerning pharmacotherapy, neurostimulation techniques and interventional management, but no comprehensive guideline encompassing all these treatments has yet been issued. We performed a systematic review of pharmacotherapy, neurostimulation, surgery, psychotherapies and other types of therapy for peripheral or central neuropathic pain, based on studies published in peer-reviewed journals before January 2018. The main inclusion criteria were chronic neuropathic pain for at least three months, a randomized controlled methodology, at least three weeks of follow-up, at least 10 patients per group, and a double-blind design for drug therapy. Based on the GRADE system, we provide weak-to-strong recommendations for use and proposal as a first-line treatment for SNRIs (duloxetine and venlafaxine), gabapentin and tricyclic antidepressants and, for topical lidocaine and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation specifically for peripheral neuropathic pain; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as a second-line treatment for pregabalin, tramadol, combination therapy (antidepressant combined with gabapentinoids), and for high-concentration capsaicin patches and botulinum toxin A specifically for peripheral neuropathic pain; a weak recommendation for use and proposal as a third-line treatment for high-frequency rTMS of the motor cortex, spinal cord stimulation (failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic polyneuropathy) and strong opioids (in the absence of an alternative). Psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness) is recommended as a second-line therapy, as an add-on to other therapies. An algorithm encompassing all the recommended treatments is proposed.

Efficacy and safety of a T-type calcium channel blocker in patients with neuropathic pain: A proof-of-concept, randomized, double-blind and controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: T-type calcium channels have been shown to play an important role in the initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain and represent a promising therapeutic target for new analgesic treatments. Ethosuximide (ETX), an anticonvulsant and a T-type channel blocker has shown analgesic effect in several chronic pain models but has not yet been evaluated in patients with neuropathic pain. METHODS: This proof-of-concept, multicentre, double-blind, controlled and randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of ETX (given as add-on therapy) to an inactive control (IC) in 114 patients with non-diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. After a 7-day run-in period, eligible patients aged over 18 years were randomly assigned (1:1) to ETX or IC for 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in the pain intensity (% of change from the baseline to end of treatment) assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with EudraCT (2013-004801-26) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02100046). RESULTS: The study was stopped during the interim analysis due to the high number of adverse events in the active treatment group. ETX failed to reduce total pain and showed a poor tolerance in comparison to IC. In the per-protocol analysis, ETX significantly reduced pain intensity by 15.6% (95% CI -25.8; -5.4) from baseline compared to IC (-7.8%, 95% CI -14.3; -1.3; p = 0.033), but this result must be interpreted with caution because of a small subgroup of patients. CONCLUSION: Ethosuximide did not reduce the severity of neuropathic pain and induces, at the doses used, many adverse events. SIGNIFICANCE: This article shows that ETX is not effective to treat neuropathic pain. Nevertheless, per-protocol analysis suggests a possible analgesic effect of ETX. Thus, our work adds significant knowledge to preclinical and clinical data on the benefits of T-type calcium channel inhibition for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Ictal asomatognosia with hemiparesis.

A 69-year-old woman presented with an ictal Anton-Babinski syndrome (asomatognosia with hemiparesis). Except for head and eye deviation to the side of the paralyzed limb, epileptic nystagmus, brief episodes of impaired consciousness, and automatisms, clinical symptomatology was identical to Anton-Babinski syndrome of vascular origin. Results of MRI imaging were normal. EEG showed a simple partial nonconvulsive status epilepticus of right parieto-temporal origin. Anton-Babinski syndrome may thus be a functional expression of focal status epilepticus.

[Pharmaco-epidemiological study on the prophylactic treatment of migraine. National inquiry on attitude to prescription practices by primary care physicians and neurologists in Franceø]. / Etude pharmaco-épidémiologique sur le traitement de fond de la migraine.

A pharmacoepidemiological survey was conducted in order to understand the pattern of migraine prophylactic drug utilization by French physicians. Neurologists and primary care physicians completed a phone-mail-phone questionnaire which inquired about migraine prophylactic treatment. French neurologists and PCP made the same use of migraine prophylaxis in terms of indication, time interval between treatment onset and evaluation, and duration. The two most commonly chosen migraine prophylactic agents were dihydroergotamine and beta-blockers. This study also showed the importance of considering quality of life to evaluate efficacy of migraine prophylaxis.

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for symptomatic non operable grade II fibrillary astrocytoma in adults]. / Chimiothérapie néoadjuvante dans les astrocytomes fibrillaires de grade II symptomatiques non opérables de l'adulte.

We collected 6 case-reports of symptomatric non removable low grade fibrillary astrocytoma of adults treated with a procarbazine-CCNU-vincristine chemotherapy regimen. All patients had drug-resistant epilepsy but brain imaging was stable. Total gross resection was rejected because of Volume or tumor location. After 4 to 7 cycles of chemotherapy, 2 patients had partial response and one minor response on brain MRI. All of them were seizure-free. Progression free survival was not reached at 5 Years. Up-front chemotherapy for low-grade astrocytomas may be useful and has to be prospectively evaluated.

Neuropathic pain: are there distinct subtypes depending on the aetiology or anatomical lesion?

Neuropathic pain can be caused by a variety of nerve lesions and it is unsettled whether it should be categorised into distinct clinical subtypes depending on aetiology or type of nerve lesion or individualised as a specific group, based on common symptomatology across aetiologies. In this study, we used a multivariate statistical method (multiple correspondence analyses) to investigate associations between neuropathic positive symptoms (assessed with a specific questionnaire, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory [NPSI]) and aetiologies, types of nerve lesion and pain localisations. We also examined the internal structure of the NPSI and its relevance to evaluation of symptoms of evoked pains by exploring their relationships with clinician-based quantified measures of allodynia and hyperalgesia. This study included 482 consecutive patients (53% men; mean age: 58+/-15 years) with pain associated with peripheral or central lesions. Factor analysis showed that neuropathic symptoms of the NPSI can be categorised into five dimensions. Spearman correlation coefficients indicated that self-reported pain evoked by brush, pressure and cold stimuli strongly correlated to allodynia/hyperalgesia to brush, von Frey hairs and cold stimuli (p<0.0001, n=90). Multiple correspondence analyses indicated few associations between symptoms (or dimensions) and aetiologies, types of lesions, or pain localisations. Exceptions included idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia. We found that there are more similarities than differences in the neuropathic positive symptoms associated with a large variety of peripheral and central lesions, providing rationale for subgrouping aetiologically diverse neuropathic patients into a specific multidimensional category for therapeutic management.

Levocarnitine administration in multiple sclerosis patients with immunosuppressive therapy-induced fatigue.

Nutritional factors and comedications are among the postulated causes of fatigue, a highly prevalent symptom in the multiple sclerosis (MS) population, with serious impact on patients' quality of life. Deficiency of carnitine may play a role by reducing energy production through fatty acid oxidation and numerous MS therapies can induce fatigue syndrome. The aim of this prospective open-labelled study was to collect and study serum carnitine levels in MS patients with and without disease-modifying treatment-induced fatigue syndrome. We investigated whether restoration of the carnitine pool might improve treatment-induced fatigue in MS patients. In our study, there was no statistical difference in fatigue frequency between treated and untreated patients (P=0.5). Matched to age, gender and treatments, carnitine levels were lower for MS treated patients compared to untreated MS patients (P <0.05) or controls (P <0.001). Consecutive patients with low plasma carnitine levels who experienced fatigue were substituted. Treatment consisted of oral levocarnitine, 3-6 g daily. All patients achieved normal plasma carnitine levels. For 63% of patients treated with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapies, oral levocarnitine adjunction decreased fatigue intensity, especially in patients treated with cyclophosphamide and interferon beta.