Disability-adjusted life years from bone and joint infections associated with antimicrobial resistance: an insight from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study.

PURPOSE: Bone and joint infections, complicated by the burgeoning challenge of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), pose significant public health threats by amplifying the disease burden globally. We leveraged results from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) to explore the impact of AMR attributed to bone and joint infections in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), elucidating the contemporary status and temporal trends. METHODS: Utilizing GBD 2019 data, we summarized the burden of bone and joint infections attributed to AMR across 195 countries and territories in the 30 years from 1990 to 2019. We review the epidemiology of AMR in terms of age-standardized rates, the estimated DALYs, comprising years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs), as well as associations between DALYs and socio-demographic indices. RESULTS: The GBD revealed that DALYs attributed to bone and joint infections associated with AMR have risen discernibly between 1990 and 2019 globally. Significant geographical disparities and a positive correlation with socio-demographic indicators were observed. Staphylococcus aureus infections, Group A Streptococcus, Group B Streptococcus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter-related bone and joint infections were associated with the highest DALYs because of a high proportion of antimicrobial resistance. Countries with limited access to healthcare, suboptimal sanitary conditions, and inconsistent antibiotic stewardship were markedly impacted. CONCLUSIONS: The GBD underscores the escalating burden of bone and joint infections exacerbated by AMR, necessitating urgent, multi-faceted interventions. Strategies to mitigate the progression and impact of AMR should emphasize prudent antimicrobial usage and robust infection prevention and control measures, coupled with advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

Clinical characteristics, injury pattern and management of pediatric pelvic fracture: An observational retrospective study from a level I trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric pelvic fractures (PPF) are uncommon among children requiring hospitalization after blunt trauma. The present study explored our experience for the prevalence, patients demographics, clinical characteristics, injury pattern and management of pediatric pelvic fractures in a level I trauma center. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained from trauma registry database for all pediatrics trauma patients of age ≤18 years. Data were analyzed according to different aspects relevant to the clinical applications such as Torode classification for pelvic ring fracture (Type I-IV), open versus closed triradiate cartilage, and surgical versus non-surgical management. RESULTS: During the study period (3 and half years), a total of 119 PPF cases were admitted at the trauma center (11% of total pediatric admissions); the majority had pelvic ring fractures (91.6%) and 8.4% had an acetabular fracture. The mean age of patients was 11.5 ± 5.7, and the majority were males (78.2%). One hundred and four fractures were classified as type I (5.8%), type II (13.5%), type III (68.3%) and type IV (12.5%). Patients in the surgical group were more likely to have higher pelvis AIS (p = 0.001), type IV fractures, acetabular fractures and closed triradiate cartilage as compared to the conservative group. Type III fractures and open triradiate cartilage were significantly higher in the conservative group (p < 0.05). Patients with closed triradiate cartilage frequently sustained spine, head injuries, acetabular fracture and had higher mean ISS and pelvis AIS (p < 0.01) than the open group. However, the rate of in-hospital complications and mortality were comparable among different groups. The overall mortality rate was 2.5%. CONCLUSION: PPF are uncommon and mainly caused by high-impact trauma associated with multisystem injuries. The majority of PPF are stable, despite the underlying high-energy mechanism. Management of PPF depends on the severity of fracture as patients with higher grade fractures require surgical intervention. Furthermore, larger prospective study is needed to understand the age-related pattern and management of PPF.

Outcome of primary deltoid ligament repair in acute ankle fractures: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

PURPOSE: The indications of deltoid ligament repair in ankle injuries with widened medial clear space in the absence of medial malleolus fracture remain controversial. Many authors reported no difference in long-term functional outcomes, while others stated that persistent medial clear space widening and malreduction are higher when deltoid ligaments went without repair. This meta-analysis aims to report the current published evidence about the outcomes of deltoid ligament repair in ankle fractures. METHODS: Several databases were searched through May 2018 for comparative studies. The primary outcome was the medial clear space correction, while secondary outcomes included maintenance of medial clear space reduction, pain scores, functional outcome, and total complications if any. Three comparative studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The analysis included a total of 192 patients, 81 in the deltoid ligament repair group and 111 in the non-repair group. RESULTS: The medial clear space correction and maintenance of the said correction on final follow-up radiographs were superior in the deltoid ligament repair group. Although the pain scores were better in the repair group at the final follow-up, this did not result in a better functional outcome, with similar total complication rates. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, those who had their deltoid ligament repaired had superior early and late radiological correction of the medial clear space, an indicator of the quality of ankle reduction with better pain scores. However, no differences in the functional outcome and complications rate were reported.

Prognostic Role of Shock Index in Traumatic Pelvic Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to validate the utility of shock index (SI) in predicting the need of blood transfusion and outcomes in patients with traumatic pelvic fracture (TPF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis for patients who sustained TPF between 2012 and 2016 in a level 1 trauma center. Patients were categorized into patients with low versus high SI based on the cutoff obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curves to predict mortality. RESULTS: A total of 966 patients sustained TPF (28.5% had SI ≥ 0.9 based on receiver operating characteristic curves) with a median age of 33 (IQR 25-47) y. Type B and C pelvic fractures significantly had higher SI. The frequency of blood transfusion use was greater in patients with high SI (P = 0.001). SI correlated significantly with Injury Severity Score (r = 0.32), Revised Trauma Score (r = -0.40), and transfused blood units (r = 0.35). Patients with high SI had prolonged hospital length of stay and higher mortality (P = 0.001). SI ≥ 0.9 showed high sensitivity and negative predictive value to identify the need of massive blood transfusion (77% and 86%, respectively) and mortality (73.5% and 98.1%, respectively). For hospital mortality, high SI had a sensitivity of 73.5%, specificity 74%, negative predictive value 98%, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.36. After adjustment for age, sex, Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Scale, pelvis Abbreviated Injury Scale, blood transfusion, and Tile classification, the multivariate analysis models showed that high SI was an independent predictor of blood transfusion (odd ratio 5.6) and mortality (odd ratio 3.63). CONCLUSIONS: SI is a potentially useful instant tool for the prediction of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with TPF. Further prospective studies are warranted to support our findings.

External fixation for primary and definitive management of open long bone fractures: the Syrian war experience.

AIMS: To report on the experience of one field hospital in using external fixation as a primary and definitive treatment for open long bone fractures during the Syrian war. METHODS: A total of 955 patients with open long bone fractures (femur, tibia, humerus) who were operated and followed up at a field hospital in Aleppo, Syria, from 2011 to 2016, were retrospectively reviewed. Different types of uniplanar and some multiplanar external fixators were used solely as a primary and definitive tool until bone union was achieved. Union rate and infection rate were reported in association with age, gender, Gustilo/Anderson classification, type of fixator, and presence of neurovascular injuries. RESULTS: Out of 955 patients, 404 (42.3%) continued to follow up until bone union or until removal of the external fixator. The average age was 27.5 ± 11 years, with 91.6% males and 8.2% females. The overall union rate was 68.3% (276/404), with 60.9% (95/156) in open femur, 70.3% (137/195) in open tibia, and 83% (44/53) in open humerus fractures. The overall infection rate was 16.7% (67/401), with 18.6% in open femur, 18.1% in open tibia, and 5.8% in open humerus fractures. CONCLUSION: The use of external fixation for definitive treatment of open long bone shaft fractures caused by high energy trauma during times of wars or conflicts is reliable and should be used in early frontline intervention and in areas with limited access to resources.

Epidemiology of acetabular fractures in Qatar.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review the epidemiological aspects of acetabular fractures treated at Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar. The study is the first orthopaedic trauma epidemiological study in Qatar and will provide a platform to advance high-level clinical research. METHODS: We obtained data for 103 patients who presented to our level I trauma centre from 2008 to 2010 with a diagnosis of acetabular fracture. Age, sex, the cause of injury, fracture classification, mode of treatment, associated nerve injuries, and other complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of acetabular fracture was 2/100,000/year. Males (93.2%) predominated. The mean age at injury time was 36 years, and the most common cause of injury was motor vehicle collisions (49.5%). Injuries were mostly primary acetabular fractures (73.6%) in comparison to (26.4%) for associated fractures. Posterior wall fractures were the most common pattern (25.2%). Associated posterior hip dislocation occurred in 21.3% of cases. Data revealed a lower incidence of post-traumatic sciatic nerve palsy (7%) that was present at the time of injury. There were no cases of reported mortality. CONCLUSION: Acetabular fractures are uncommon injuries with motor vehicle collision being the most common cause of injury. Posterior wall fracture was the most frequent pattern, and most of the patients were males. The incidence of post-traumatic sciatic nerve palsy and the proportion of injured women were lower than those reported in literature. Well-trained surgeons and specialized centres for treating these injuries are recommended.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ideal treatment of acute anterior shoulder dislocation remains one of the topics that spark debate over the value of primary repair for the first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. The high rate of complications especially in young adults, such as recurrent instability, residual pain, and inability to return to sports, has led to the quest for an ideal management of such injuries. OBJECTIVE: In this meta-analysis, we compare between the immediate arthroscopic repair and conservative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation as well as arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. Outcome measures were failure rate (dislocation, subluxation, and instability) and revision rates. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched several database including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov through August 2017 to identify observational and experimental randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of immediate arthroscopic repair and conservative treatment of primary shoulder dislocations as well as arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation. The primary outcome was failure rate, whereas, secondary outcomes were revision rate and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Out of the 710 studies identified, 12 were eligible for meta-analysis. The estimated pooled failure rate was 13.7% (7.7%-19.6%), whereas, the pooled revision rate was 7.1% (3.8%-10.4%) in immediate arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation. The odd ratio (OR) of failure and revision rates were significantly lower in arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation compared to conservative treatment (OR 0.103, 95% CI [0.052, 0.201]), (OR 0.217, 95% CI [0.078, 0.607]), respectively. The odd ratio (OD) of failure and revision rates were lower in arthroscopic repair of primary shoulder dislocation compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of the recurrent shoulder dislocation; however, the difference was statistically insignificant (OR 0.423, 95% CI [0.117, 1.522]) and (OR 0.358, 95% CI [0.044, 2.920]) respectively. CONCLUSION: The outcome of immediate arthroscopic repair of primary anterior shoulder dislocation is superior and encouraging with significant reduction in failure and revision rates compared to conservative treatment. Nevertheless, the failure and revision rates are statistically insignificant compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation. Hence, there is evidence to support immediate arthroscopic repair option for primary anterior shoulder dislocations over conservative treatment in young active patients, in order to reduce the risk of failure and revision rates. However, the evidence is inconclusive compared to arthroscopic reconstruction of recurrent dislocation.

Prevalence of Peroneal Tendon Instability in Calcaneus Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Peroneal tendon instability associated with an intraarticular calcaneal fracture is a common injury that still often passes undiscovered by both radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. Timely identification of this injury will guide the choice of surgical technique used and treatment of patients. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, several databases were searched through June 2017 for any observational or experimental studies that reported the prevalence/incidence of peroneal tendon subluxation/dislocation with a calcaneus fracture with regard to fracture classifications and the significance of the fleck sign. Nine studies were included, with 1027 patients and 1050 calcaneus fractures. The overall prevalence of peroneal instability (PI) in association with a calcaneus fracture was 29.3%. An increasing prevalence of PI increased the severity of the calcaneus fractures, 5.4% in Sanders I, 19% in Sanders II, 39.4% in Sanders III, and 49.5% in Sanders IV. The presence of a fleck sign is a strong indicator of PI, with a prevalence of 54.7%. The computed tomography findings can overestimate the presence of PI compared with the intraoperative findings. The global reported prevalence of peroneal tendon instability associated with intraarticular calcaneal fractures is high and increases with increasing severity of the calcaneus fracture.

Pelvic fracture instability-associated L5 transverse process fracture, fact or myth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Stable or unstable pelvic ring fractures are sometimes associated with L5 transverse process (TP) fractures. This review aimed to determine the effect of L5 TP fractures on pelvic ring fracture stability. METHODS: We searched electronic databases (including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS) and performed hand searching of English orthopedics journals and conference abstracts until May 2017. We pooled data from five studies, with a total of 278 patients. RESULTS: Of 28 studies, five were included (four studies involved adult patients, one pediatric population). Of the 278 pelvic fractures (average age 37.33 years; male 132 and female 92), 99 (35.6%) were stable and 179 (64.4%) were unstable (fracture B and C, according to the Tile classification). Sixty-seven (24.1%) were cases with L5 TP, and 211 (75.9%) were cases without L5 TP fracture. The typical causes of injury were road traffic accident (59.2%), fall from height (23.6%), and crush injuries and injuries by heavy objects (17.2%). The pooled odds ratio (OR) of L5 TP between the stable and unstable groups calculated with random effect analysis was 0.418 (0.083-2.108; p = 0.291); after excluding the study on a pediatric population, the pooled OR was 0.349 (0.056-2.159; p = 0.258). CONCLUSIONS: L5 TP fractures may indicate high-energy trauma; however, no relationship between L5 TP fractures and pelvic ring fracture stability exists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV.

Clinical series of three hundred and twenty two cases of Achilles tendon section with laceration.

PURPOSE: We aim to report the epidemiology of open Achilles tendon lacerations to determine the incidence of associated complications and identify the factors contributing to the development of the infection after repair and to propose a treatment protocol for this rare injury. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical charts of patients with open Achilles tendon injury operated and followed up at the orthopedic department at Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar, from 2010 to 2015. RESULTS: There were (322) cases of open Achilles tendon lacerations, average age (32.1 years), (97.5 %) male. The most common cause was found to be slipping in the bathroom (81.7 %), followed by injury from sharp objects (15.5 %), and injury while using a grinder (2.8 %). Partial cuts were more common than complete cuts (63.5 %) and (35.9 %). The infection rate was 8.7 %. The patient-related factors that affected the infection rate was age (p = 0.02), diabetes, smoking status, the cause of injury and type of cut did not affect the infection rate. Management-related factors that affected the infection rate were time to surgery (p <0.001) and the length of hospital stay (p <0.001). With regard to surgery-related factors, there was no difference in infection rate by suture type (p = 0.373), immobilization type (p = 0.493), and surgeon experience (p = 0.481). The reoperation rate was a higher in the infected group as compared to the non-infected group (p = <0.001). DISCUSSION: Open Achilles tendon lacerations is common in Qatar, despite the dirty environment of the common cause (bathroom injury) the incidence of infection is low if proper protocol is followed including early irrigation in emergency, early antibiotics such as cefazolin for 72 hours, and primary repair under sterile environment in operating theater, followed by immobilization with or without slab. CONCLUSION: The incidence of a major complication in primary open Achilles tendon lacerations repairs is relatively low. Primary Achilles tendon laceration repair is safe.

Efficiency of fragment specific fixation plates in the treatment of comminuted distal radial fractures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical, radiologic and functional outcome of treating comminuted intra-articular distal radius fractures with fragment specific fixation. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of 25 unstable intra-articular distal radius fractures (type C2 AO) that had fragment specific fixation done in the orthopaedic department of the Hamad General Hospital (level 1 trauma center) over three years (2010-2013), with a follow up of one year post-operatively. Pre-operative X-rays (wrist parameters) were compared to post-operative X-rays at different time points (i.e. 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, etc.). Range of motion and grip strength were recorded at different time points until the final follow up evaluation. All the data has been obtained from patients' charts (including outpatient and occupational therapy rehabilitation range of motion data) after final approval from the Hamad Corporation medical research center/Ethics committee. RESULTS: There were 25 patients ranging in age from 24 to 58 years with 13 patients above 35 years (52%) and 12 patients below 35 years (48%). There were 22 males (88%) and 3 females (12%) with different mechanisms of injury such as falling from height (average 2 metres), which was the most common with 13 patients (52%), and most were work related. Left wrist was more common than right wrist injuries and mostly in the non-dominant hand with 14 patients (56%). There was an obvious improvement between pre and post-operative wrist parameters at different time points, but P-values were not significant; supination and pronation at six weeks of follow up showed significant values (p = 0.04 & 0.03, respectively). Grip strength improved about 76% compared to the normal side. CONCLUSIONS: Fragment specific fixation is a reasonable alternative for treating intra-articular distal radius fractures. At final follow up evaluations, results showed a better clinical, radiological and functional outcome. Stable fixation allowed starting active and passive motion of the wrist without compromising post-operative alignment.

Stand-Alone Anchored Spacer vs Anterior Plate Construct in the Management of Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgically treated adjacent segment disease (ASDis) following ACDF with either anterior plate construct (APC) or stand-alone anchored spacers (SAAS). METHOD: Multiple databases were searched until December 2022 for pertinent studies. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life outcomes [JOA, NDI, and VAS], whereas, the secondary outcomes included operative characteristics [estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative time (OT)], radiological outcomes [C2-C7 Cobb angle, disc height index (DHI) changes, fusion rate], and complications. RESULTS: A total of 5 studies were included, comprising 210 patients who had been surgically treated for cervical ASDis. Among them, 113 received APC, and 97 received SAAS. Postoperative dysphagia was significantly higher in the APC group [47% vs 11%, OR = 7.7, 95% CI = 3.1-18.9, P < .05]. Similarly, operative time and blood loss were higher in the APC group compared to the SAAS group; [MD = 16.96, 95% CI = 7.87-26.06, P < .05] and [MD = 5.22, 95% CI = .35 - 10.09, P < .05], respectively. However, there was no difference in the rate of prolonged dysphagia and clinical outcomes in terms of JOA, NDI, and VAS. Furthermore, there was no difference in the radiological parameters including the C2-7 Cobb angle and DHI as well as the fusion rate. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrated that both surgical techniques (APC and SAAS) are effective in treating ASDis. However, with low certainty of the evidence, considering patients are at high risk of dysphagia following revision cervical spine surgery SAAS may be the preferred choice.

Surgeon Perceptions of Performing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in an Ambulatory Surgical Center vs Hospital Setting in the Elderly Population: Results of a Surgeon Survey.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing acceptance of conducting minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the Hospitals Without Walls (HWW) program in March 2020. This program granted hospitals regulatory flexibility to offer services and procedures in nontraditional locations, including ASCs. However, implementation hurdles persist. METHODS: A survey was sent to 235 surgeons regarding the use of ASCs for performing TLIF surgeries on elderly patients. Multiple-choice questions covering various aspects of TLIF practice preferences, including surgical indications, decision factors for choosing ASCs over hospitals, implementation hurdles, reimbursement concerns, staffing issues, and the impact of CMS rules and regulations on TLIF in ASCs, particularly concerning physician ownership and self-referral conflicts governed by the Stark law, were asked. RESULTS: The survey completion rate was 25.8% (Figure 1). The most common surgical indications for TLIF in ASCs were spondylolisthesis (80%), spinal stenosis (62.5%), and low back pain (47.5%). Most surgeons (78%) believed TLIF could be safely performed in ASCs. Streamlined workflow, lower infection rates, and cost-effectiveness were advantages listed by 58.5% of surgeons. Patient's medical history (75.8%), followed by ASC resources and capabilities (61%) and surgeon preference (61%), were relevant factors. Higher efficiencies at ASCs (14.6%), contractual issues (9.8%), and ownership issues (7.3%) were less relevant to surgeons. About 65.9% of surgeons reported lower reimbursement in ASCs, and 43.9% said it was an implementation hurdle. Lower direct costs were reported by 53.7% of surgeons. Other hurdles included a lack of trained staff (24.4%), inadequate staffing (22.0%), cost overruns (26.8%), high Joint Commission or the Accreditation Association for Ambulatory Health Care credentialing costs, and surgeons feeling uncomfortable performing TLIF in ASCs (22.0%). Only 17.1% listed medical problems as a reason their patient was considered unsuitable for the ASC environment. A majority (53.7%) stated that their ASCs complied with strict Stark requirements by disclosing physician ownership interests. However, 22% of surgeons reported self-referrals under the "In-Office Ancillary Services Exception" allowed by the Stark law. CONCLUSION: Our survey data show that surgeons' perceptions of current CMS rules and regulations may hinder the transition into the ASC setting because they think the reimbursement is too low and the regulatory burden is too high. ASCs have disproportionally higher initial acquisition and ongoing costs related to staff training and maintenance of the TLIF technology that CMS should consider when determining the appropriate financial remuneration for these complex procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ASC offers a viable and attractive option for their TLIF procedure with the advantage of same-day discharge and at-home recovery.

Polytomous Rasch Analyses of Surgeons' Decision-Making on Choice of Procedure in Endoscopic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompression Surgeries.

BACKGROUND: With the growing prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis, endoscopic surgery, which incorporates techniques such as transforaminal, interlaminar, and unilateral biportal (UBE) endoscopy, is increasingly considered. However, the patient selection criteria are debated among spine surgeons. OBJECTIVE: This study used a polytomous Rasch analysis to evaluate the factors influencing surgeon decision-making in selecting patients for endoscopic surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: A comprehensive survey was distributed to a representative sample of 296 spine surgeons. Questions encompassed various patient-related and clinical factors, and responses were captured on a logit scale graphically displaying person-item maps and category probability curves for each test item. Using a Rasch analysis, the data were subsequently analyzed to determine the latent traits influencing decision-making. RESULTS: The Rasch analysis revealed that surgeons' preferences for transforaminal, interlaminar, and UBE techniques were easily influenced by comfort level and experience with the endoscopic procedure and patient-related factors. Harder-to-agree items included technological aspects, favorable clinical outcomes, and postoperative functional recovery and rehabilitation. Descriptive statistics suggested interlaminar as the best endoscopic spinal stenosis decompression technique. However, logit person-item analysis integral to the Rasch methodology showed highest intensity for transforaminal followed by interlaminar endoscopic lumbar stenosis decompression. The UBE technique was the hardest to agree on with a disordered person-item analysis and thresholds in category probability curve plots. CONCLUSION: Surgeon decision-making in selecting patients for endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis is multifaceted. While the framework of clinical guidelines remains paramount, on-the-ground experience-based factors significantly influence surgeons' selection of patients for endoscopic lumbar spinal stenosis surgeries. The Rasch methodology allows for a more granular psychometric evaluation of surgeon decision-making and accounts better for years-long experience that may be lost in standardized clinical guideline development. This new approach to assessing spine surgeons' thought processes may improve the implementation of evidence-based protocol change dictated by technological advances was endorsed by the Interamerican Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SICCMI), the International Society for Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery (ISMISS), the Mexican Spine Society (AMCICO), the Brazilian Spine Society (SBC), the Society for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (SMISS), the Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Society (KOMISS), and the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS).

The Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Using a Stand-Alone Implant Versus Traditional Interbody Polyetheretherketone Cage, Titanium Plate, and Screw Instrumentation.

INTRODUCTION: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is the standard surgical procedure for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, although ACDF includes risks of adjacent segment disease (ASD) and subsequent revision procedures. Various interbody cage, plate, and screw options can be utilized. Stand-alone devices were designed to overcome undesired complications of hardware prominence and associated dysphagia, soft tissue violation, and adjacent level encroachment. Implants include biomechanical structural support (cage) composed of various materials (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)/titanium) and integral fixation (screws/blades). The purpose was to compare intraoperative, short- and long-term outcomes of revision ACDF using a stand-alone implant (ACDF-ZP group) versus traditional interbody PEEK cage, titanium plate, and screw instrumentation (ACDF-CP group). METHODS: This was a retrospective, cohort study reviewing charts of patients who underwent revision ACDF. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes and complications. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included (ACDF-ZP group = 50; ACDF-CP group = 11). In-hospital incidence of dysphagia was significantly less in the ACDF-CP group (P = 0.041). Thrity-one (62.0%) of the ACDF-ZP group reported dysphagia postoperatively, half resolved by 6 weeks, and two persisted for more than 6 months. Five (45.5%) of the ACDF-CP group reported dysphagia with most resolving within 6 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in short- or long-term complications, dysphonia, or reoperation rates. No statistical significance was seen in blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, local and global alignment, or cage subsidence. CONCLUSION: Rates of dysphagia were comparable between groups at short and long-term follow-up, despite a greater incidence of postoperative dysphagia in the ACDF-ZP group. All complications and occurrences of cage subsidence were observed in the ACDF-ZP group, which may be attributed to the larger sample size. Given these findings, zero-profile stand-alone implants and traditional interbody PEEK cage, titanium plate, and screw instrumentation appear to be both safe and effective options for revision ACDF.

Open and closed reduction methods for intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Introduction: Closed reduction and intramedullary nailing is the preferred surgical intervention for femoral shaft fractures. Open reduction involves opening the fracture site and is performed in various circumstances. Comparative studies of the approaches have conflicting results. We sought to compare the outcomes and complications of open and closed reduction for intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Materials and methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of comparative studies included the databases and registers PubMed (Medline), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42022325382). Additional studies were identified through hand and citation searching. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were determined for continuous variables, whereas odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed for dichotomous variables. Results: Closed reduction had a higher pooled union rate (93.93%, 92.02%), an increased odds ratio for union (OR = 1.624 [95% CI: 1.004, 2.624]; p = .048), and a faster time to union (SMD = -0.292 [95% CI: -0.549, -0.0.035]; p = .026). There were no differences in operative time (SMD = 0.128 [95% CI: -0.700, 0.956] p = .762) or overall complication rate (OR = 1.314 [95% CI: 0.966, 1.787] p = .082). Conclusions: Closed reduction has the advantage of higher union rates, quicker time to union, and lower overall infection compared to open reduction for intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Open reduction remains a reasonable alternative with acceptable union rates when closed reduction is not feasible.

The Reliability of Postoperative Radiographic Matta Grading for Quality of Reduction of Acetabular Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reliability of the postoperative radiographic Matta grading for quality of reduction of acetabular fractures. DESIGN: An inter-reliability and intrareliability study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: 15 independent observers of different levels of experience who evaluated 115 sets of postoperative acetabulum radiographs in 35 consecutive patients with displaced acetabular fractures between January 2017 and January 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: To assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Matta radiographic grading for postoperative quality of reduction of acetabular fractures. RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement was excellent among all groups with an average absolute intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.91 (95% CI 0.93-0.97). When stratifying the agreement based on experience, the orthopaedic trauma fellow subgroup had the highest rate with an ICC of 0.92. The overall intraobserver agreement was good with an ICC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.85). CONCLUSION: The Matta radiographic grading was a reliable tool for the evaluation of quality of reduction after surgical fixation of acetabular fractures with excellent interobserver and good intraobserver reliabilities among different levels of observers.

The Impact of Prior Bariatric Surgery on Outcomes After Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes and complication rates in patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS) prior to spine surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines comparing the outcomes of spine surgery between subjects with prior bariatric surgery to those who were considered obese with no prior bariatric surgery. RESULTS: A total of 183, 570 patients were included in the 4 studies meeting inclusion criteria. The mean patient age was 52.9 years, and the majority were female (68%). The two groups consisted of a total of 36, 876 patients with prior BS and 146, 694 obese patients without prior BS. The overall rate of complications in the prior BS group was 6.4% (4.5%-38.7%) compared to 11.9% (11.2%-55.4%) in the non-prior BS obese group with a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The prior BS group had lower rates of renal, neurological, and thromboembolic complications, with a lower mortality and readmission rate. In a subgroup undergoing cervical spine surgery, patients with prior BS had fewer cardiac, GI, and total complications. For patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery, patients with prior BS had fewer thromboembolic and total complications. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing bariatric surgery prior to spine surgery had fewer renal, neurological, and thromboembolic complications as well as a decreased mortality and readmission rate.

Minimally Invasive Scoliosis Surgery Is a Feasible Option for Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis and Has Equivalent Outcomes to Open Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between minimally invasive scoliosis surgery (MISS) and traditional posterior instrumentation and fusion in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and Cochrane databases, including studies reporting outcomes for both MISS and open correction of AIS. Study details, demographics, and outcomes, including curve correction, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, postoperative pain, length of stay (LOS), and complications, were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4 studies met the selection criteria and were included in the analysis, totaling 107 patients (42 MIS and 65 open) with a mean age of 16 years. Overall there was no difference in curve correction between MISS (73.2%) and open (76.7%) cohorts. EBL was significantly lower in the MISS (271 ml) compared to the open (527 ml) group, but operative time was significantly longer (380 min for MISS versus 302 min for open). There were no significant differences between the approaches in pain, LOS, complications, or reoperations. CONCLUSION: MISS was associated with less blood loss but longer operative times compared to traditional open fusion for AIS. There was no difference in curve correction, postoperative pain, LOS, or complications/reoperations. While MISS has emerged as a feasible option for the surgical management of AIS, further research is warranted to compare these 2 approaches.

The outcome of hyperbaric oxygen therapy versus core decompression in the non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Core decompression (CD) has been used in the treatment of pre-collapse stages avascular necrosis (AVN) with good results. Hyperbaric oygen therapy (HBO) was used as a non-invasive treatment for pre-collapse stages osteonecrosis with favorable results. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of HBO versus CD in stage II of non-traumatic AVN of the femoral head. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively for patients with non-traumatic AVN of the femoral head that was confirmed by MRI and underwent HBO or CD between January 2010 and December 2018, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), radiographic progression, and Short-Form 12(SF12) were used to assess the outcomes. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with 23 stage II AVN of the femoral head were included, 12 (52.2%) in CD, and 11 (47.8%) in the HBO group with an average follow-up of 34.2 ± 18.4 months.66.7% of patients in CD and 81.8% in the HBO group achieved satisfactory hip function outcome with statistically significant mean Oxford Hip Score (35.8 ± 6.7 and 35.5 ± 5.1) (P 0.009 & .003) respectively.No statistical difference of OHS and SF12 (PCS &MCS) was found between the two groups (P 0.202, 0.128 & .670 respectively).Eight (34.7%) cases progressed to a higher radiological stage at one year follow-up. The rate of progression was not statistically significant between both groups (P 0.469) with no statistical difference of OHS and SF12 (PCS & MCS) in the progressed group (P 0.747, 0.648 & 0.416) respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the HBO is promising and as effective as CD in the treatment of non-traumatic pre-collapsed AVN of the femoral head. Hence, HBO could be used as an alternative non-invasive treatment option.