Combination of or Transition between Deep Brain Stimulation and Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: Neuromodulation is an important treatment modality for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resective or ablative procedures. However, randomized controlled trials and real-world studies reveal that a subset of patients will experience minimal reduction or even an increase in seizure frequency after neuromodulation. We describe our experience with patients who undergo a second intracranial neuromodulation procedure after unsatisfactory initial response to intracranial neuromodulation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review to identify all patients who had undergone deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS), followed by additional intracranial neuromodulatory procedures, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Demographic and clinical data, including seizure frequencies, were collected. RESULTS: All patients had temporal lobe epilepsy. Six patients were treated with concurrent ANT DBS and temporal lobe RNS, and 3 patients transitioned between neuromodulation systems. Of the patients treated concurrently with ANT DBS and temporal lobe RNS, 5 of the 6 patients experienced additional reduction in seizure frequency after adding a second neuromodulation system. Of the patients who switched between neuromodulation modalities, all patients experienced further reduction in seizure frequency. CONCLUSIONS: For patients who do not experience adequate benefit from initial therapy with ANT DBS or temporal lobe RNS, the addition of a neuromodulation system or switching to a different form of neuromodulation may allow for additional reduction in seizure frequency. Larger studies will need to be performed to understand whether the use of multiple systems concurrently leads to improved clinical results in patients who are initially treatment resistant to neuromodulation.

Sensing with deep brain stimulation device in epilepsy: Aperiodic changes in thalamic local field potential during seizures.

OBJECTIVE: Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapeutic option in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Recent DBS devices with sensing capabilities enable chronic, outpatient local field potential (LFP) recordings. Whereas beta oscillations have been demonstrated to be a useful biomarker in movement disorders, the clinical utility of DBS sensing in epilepsy remains unclear. Our aim was to determine LFP features that distinguish ictal from inter-ictal states, which may aid in tracking seizure outcomes with DBS. METHODS: Electrophysiology data were obtained from DBS devices implanted in the anterior nucleus (N = 12) or centromedian nucleus (N = 2) of the thalamus. Power spectra recorded during patient/caregiver-marked seizure events were analyzed with a method that quantitatively separates the oscillatory and non-oscillatory/aperiodic components of the LFP using non-parametric statistics, without the need for pre-specification of the frequency bands of interest. Features of the LFP parameterized using this algorithm were compared with those from inter-ictal power spectra recorded in clinic. RESULTS: Oscillatory activity in multiple canonical frequency bands was identified from the power spectra in 86.48% of patient-marked seizure events. Delta oscillations were present in all patients, followed by theta (N = 10) and beta (N = 9). Although there were no differences in oscillatory LFP features between the ictal and inter-ictal states, there was a steeper decline in the 1/f slope of the aperiodic component of the LFP during seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Our work highlights the potential and shortcomings of chronic LFP recordings in thalamic DBS for epilepsy. Findings suggest that no single frequency band in isolation clearly differentiates seizures, and that features of aperiodic LFP activity may be clinically-relevant biomarkers of seizures.

Stereoelectroencephalography-guided radiofrequency ablation of the epileptogenic zone as a treatment and predictor of future success of further surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly being used as a treatment for drug-resistant localization-related epilepsy. The aim of this study is to analyze the successes and failures using RFA and how response correlates with surgical epilepsy treatment outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients who underwent RFA via SEEG electrodes. After excluding five, the remaining 57 were classified into subgroups based on procedures and outcomes. Forty patients (70%) underwent a secondary surgical procedure, of whom 32 were delayed: 26 laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), five resection, one neuromodulation. We determined the predictive value of RFA outcome upon subsequent surgical outcome by categorizing the delayed secondary surgery outcome as success (Engel I/II) versus failure (Engel III/IV). Demographic information, epilepsy characteristics, and the transient time of seizure freedom after RFA were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Twelve of 49 patients (24.5%) who had RFA alone and delayed follow-up achieved Engel class I. Of the 32 patients who underwent a delayed secondary surgical procedure, 15 achieved Engel class I and nine Engel class II (24 successes), and eight were considered failures (Engel class III/IV). The transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was significantly longer in the success group (4 months, SD = 2.6) as compared to the failure group (.75 months, SD = 1.16; p < .001). Additionally, there was a higher portion of preoperative lesional findings in patients in the RFA alone and delayed surgical success group (p = .03) and a longer time to seizure recurrence in the presence of lesions (p < .05). Side effects occurred in 1% of patients. SIGNIFICANCE: In this series, RFA provided a treatment during SEEG-guided intracranial monitoring that led to seizure freedom in ~25% of patients. Of the 70% who underwent delayed surgery, longer transient time of seizure freedom after RFA was predictive of the results of the secondary surgeries, 74% of which were LITT.

Anterior nucleus of the thalamus deep brain stimulation vs temporal lobe responsive neurostimulation for temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Based on the promising results of randomized controlled trials, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are used increasingly in the treatment of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is an indication for either DBS of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) or temporal lobe (TL) RNS, but there are no studies that directly compare the seizure benefits and adverse effects associated with these therapies in this patient population. We, therefore, examined all patients who underwent ANT-DBS or TL-RNS for drug-resistant TLE at our center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who were treated with either ANT-DBS or TL-RNS for drug-resistant TLE with at least 12 months of follow-up. Along with the clinical characteristics of each patient's epilepsy, seizure frequency was recorded throughout each patient's postoperative clinical course. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent ANT-DBS implantation and 32 patients underwent TL-RNS for drug-resistant TLE. The epilepsy characteristics of both groups were similar. Patients who underwent ANT-DBS demonstrated a median seizure reduction of 58% at 12-15 months, compared to a median seizure reduction of 70% at 12-15 months in patients treated with TL-RNS (p > .05). The responder rate (percentage of patients with a 50% decrease or more in seizure frequency) was 54% for ANT-DBS and 56% for TL-RNS (p > .05). The incidence of complications and stimulation-related side effects did not significantly differ between therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: We demonstrate in our single-center experience that patients with drug-resistant TLE benefit similarly from either ANT-DBS or TL-RNS. Selection of either ANT-DBS or TL-RNS may, therefore, depend more heavily on patient and provider preference, as each has unique capabilities and configurations. Future studies will consider subgroup analyses to determine if specific patients have greater seizure frequency reduction from one form of neuromodulation strategy over another.

Surgical Treatment of Drug-Resistant Generalized Epilepsy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize current evidence and recent developments in the surgical treatment of drug-resistant generalized epilepsy. RECENT FINDINGS: Current surgical treatments of drug-resistant generalized epilepsy include vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and corpus callosotomy (CC). Neurostimulation with VNS and/or DBS has been shown to be effective in reducing seizure frequency in patients with generalized epilepsy. DBS for generalized epilepsy is primarily consisted of open-loop stimulation directed at the centromedian (CM) nucleus in the thalamus, though closed-loop stimulation and additional targets are being explored. CC can be effective in treating some seizure types and can be performed using traditional surgical techniques or with the less invasive methods of laser ablation and radiosurgery. This current literature supports the use of VNS, DBS and CC, alone or in combination, as palliative treatments of drug-resistant generalized epilepsy.

Stereotactic MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for extratemporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRg-LITT) is an alternative to open epilepsy surgery. We assess safety and effectiveness of MRg-LITT for extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE) in patients who are considered less favorable for open resection. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed sequential cases of patients with focal ETLE who underwent MRg-LITT between 2012 and 2019. Epileptogenic zones were determined from standard clinical and imaging data ± stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). Standard stereotactic techniques, MRI thermometry, and a commercial laser thermal therapy system were used for ablations. Anatomic MRI was used to calculate ablation volumes. Clinical outcomes were determined longitudinally. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients with mean epilepsy duration of 21.3 ± 12.2 years underwent MRg-LITT for focal ETLE at a mean age 36.4 ± 12.7 years. A mean 2.59 ± 1.45 trajectories per patient were used to obtain ablation volumes of 8.8 ± 7.5 cm3 . Mean follow-up was 27.3 ± 19.5 months. Of 32 patients with >12 months of follow-up, 17 (53%) achieved good outcomes (Engel class I + II) of whom 14 (44%) were Engel class I. Subgroup analysis revealed better outcomes for patients with lesional ETLE than for those who were nonlesional, multifocal, or who had failed prior interventions (P = .02). Of 13 patients showing favorable seizure-onset patterns (localized low voltage fast activity or rhythmic spiking on SEEG) prior to ablation, 9 (69%) achieved good outcomes, whereas only 3 of 11 (27%) who show other slower onset patterns achieved good outcomes. Minor adverse events included six patients with transient sensorimotor neurologic deficits and four patients with asymptomatic hemorrhages along the fiber tract. Major adverse events included one patient with a brain abscess that required stereotactic drainage and one patient with persistent hypothalamic obesity. Three deaths-two seizure-associated and one suicide-were unrelated to surgical procedures. SIGNIFICANCE: MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (or MRg-LITT) was well-tolerated and yielded good outcomes in a heterogeneous group of ETLE patients. Lesional epilepsy and favorable seizure-onset patterns on SEEG predicted higher likelihoods of success.

Multitarget deep brain stimulation for epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a rapidly growing surgical option for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resective/ablative surgery. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated efficacy of DBS of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), particularly in frontal or temporal epilepsy, whereas DBS of the centromedian (CM) nucleus appears to be most suitable in well-defined generalized epilepsy syndromes. At the authors' institution, DBS candidates who did not fit the populations represented in these trials were managed with DBS of multiple distinct targets, which included ANT, CM, and less-studied nuclei-i.e., mediodorsal nucleus, pulvinar, and subthalamic nucleus. The goal of this study was to present the authors' experience with these types of cases, and to motivate future investigations that can determine the long-term efficacy of multitarget DBS. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study of adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent multitarget DBS was performed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of this approach, and to present seizure outcomes. Patients in this cohort had epilepsy with features that were difficult to treat with DBS of the ANT or CM nucleus alone, including multifocal/multilobar, diffuse-onset, and/or posterior-onset seizures; or both generalized and focal seizures. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent DBS of 2-3 distinct thalamic/subthalamic nuclei. DBS was performed with 2 electrodes in each hemisphere. All leads in each patient were implanted with either frontal or parietal trajectories. There were no surgical complications. Among those with > 6 months of follow-up (n = 5; range 7-21 months), all patients were responders in terms of overall seizure frequency and/or convulsive seizure frequency (i.e., ≥ 50% reduction). Two patients had adverse stimulation effects, which resolved with further programming. CONCLUSIONS: Multitarget DBS is a procedurally feasible and safe treatment strategy to maximize outcomes in patients with complex epilepsy. The authors highlight their approach to inform future studies that are sufficiently powered to assess its efficacy.

An ordinal clinical score predicts seizure freedom after minimally invasive epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To predict one-year seizure freedom, using a combination of relevant clinical variables, following stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy in a series of 101 patients. METHODS: Eight predictors of seizure freedom were selected based on their association with medial temporal lobe epilepsy: (1) MRI evidence of mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS); (2) unitemporal interictal epileptiform discharges; (3) absence of generalized tonic-clonic seizures; (4) history of febrile seizures; (5) onset of epilepsy ≤16 years; (6) absence of an auditory, visual, or vertiginous aura; and (7) unitemporal ictal onset; (8) unitemporal PET hypometabolism. We compared four multivariate models: "MTS," using just evidence of MTS; "FULL," using all eight binary predictors; "AIC" using backwards selection of variables; and "SCORE," using a 0-to-8-point ordinal score awarding one point for each binary predictor. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, significant predictors for seizure freedom were evidence of mesial temporal sclerosis (p = 0.011, Fisher exact) and unitemporal interictal discharges (p = 0.005). For multivariate prediction (using leave one-out cross-validation), the ordinal SCORE model had a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC 0.70) than the other three models: MTS (AUC 0.54, p = 0.002, Delong's test), FULL (AUC 0.62, p = 0.003), or AIC (AUC 0.53, p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: An ordinal score incorporating eight independent binary clinical variables predicted seizure freedom better on novel data than a model using MTS alone, a full multivariate model, or a backwards selected model. The ordinal score model represents a simple clinical heuristic to identify which patients should be offered minimally invasive laser surgery.

Selective Posterior Cerebral Artery Wada Better Predicts Good Memory and Naming Outcomes Following Selective Stereotactic Thermal Ablation for Medial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Than Internal Carotid Artery Wada.

The conventional intracarotid amobarbital (Wada) test has been used to assess memory function in patients being considered for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery. Minimally invasive approaches that target the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and spare neocortex are increasingly used, but a knowledge gap remains in how to assess memory and language risk from these procedures. We retrospectively compared results of two versions of the Wada test, the intracarotid artery (ICA-Wada) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA-Wada) approaches, with respect to predicting subsequent memory and language outcomes, particularly after stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH). We included all patients being considered for SLAH who underwent both ICA-Wada and PCA-Wada at a single institution. Memory and confrontation naming assessments were conducted using standardized neuropsychological tests to assess pre- to post-surgical changes in cognitive performance. Of 13 patients who initially failed the ICA-Wada, only one patient subsequently failed the PCA-Wada (p=0.003, two-sided binomial test with p 0 =0.5) demonstrating that these tests assess different brain regions or networks. PCA-Wada had a high negative predictive value for the safety of SLAH, compared to ICA-Wada, as none of the patients who underwent SLAH after passing the PCA-Wada experienced catastrophic memory decline (0 of 9 subjects, p <.004, two-sided binomial test with p 0 =0.5), and all experienced a good cognitive outcome. In contrast, the single patient who received a left anterior temporal lobectomy after failed ICA- and passed PCA-Wada experienced a persistent, near catastrophic memory decline. On confrontation naming, few patients exhibited disturbance during the PCA-Wada. Following surgery, SLAH patients showed no naming decline, while open resection patients, whose surgeries all included ipsilateral temporal lobe neocortex, experienced significant naming difficulties (Fisher's exact test, p <.05). These findings demonstrate that (1) failing the ICA-Wada falsely predicts memory decline following SLAH, (2) PCA-Wada better predicts good memory outcomes of SLAH for MTLE, and (3) the MTL brain structures affected by both PCA-Wada and SLAH are not directly involved in language processing.

Mapping the Central Sulcus Extraoperatively Using Stereoelectroencephalography: A New Application of an Established Method.

PURPOSE: Central sulcus localization is undertaken intraoperatively with subdural electrodes through a phase reversal technique using somatosensory evoked potentials from sensorimotor cortices. Extraoperative central sulcus localization using stereoelectroencephalography has not been described previously. METHODS: Six pediatric patients (aged 12-18 years, 50% females) were investigated with stereoelectroencephalography. Peripheral median and posterior tibial nerve stimulation were performed while recording somatosensory evoked potentials from stereoelectroencephalography electrodes. RESULTS: Central sulcus was successfully localized by this novel method, and this was further supplemented by cortical stimulation data. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of somatosensory evoked potentials gained using stereoelectroencephalography in primary motor and sensory cortices. This can further supplement other data for safe surgical resection in the eloquent cortex.

The Referential Montage Inadequately Localizes Corticocortical Evoked Potentials in Stereoelectroencephalography.

PURPOSE: Corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) resulting from single pulse electrical stimulation are increasingly used to understand seizure networks, as well as normal brain connectivity. However, we observed that when using depth electrodes, traditional measures of CCEPs amplitude using a referential montage can be falsely localizing, often to white matter. METHODS: We pooled 27 linear electrode arrays targeting the amygdala, hippocampus, or cingulate cortex from eight participants. Using postoperative imaging, we classified contacts as being in gray matter, white matter, or bordering each and measured the amplitude using the root-mean-squared deviation from baseline in a referential, common average, bipolar, or Laplacian montage. RESULTS: Of 27 electrode contacts, 25 (93%) had a significantly higher mean amplitude when in gray matter than in white matter using a Laplacian montage, which was significantly more than the 12 of 27 electrodes (44%) when using a referential montage ( P = 0.0003, Fisher exact test). The area under the curve for a receiver operating characteristic classifying contacts as gray or white matter was significantly higher for either the Laplacian (0.79) or the bipolar (0.72) montage when compared with either the common average (0.56) or the referential (0.51) montage ( P ≤ 0.005, bootstrap). CONCLUSIONS: Both the Laplacian and bipolar montages were superior to the common average or referential montage in localizing CCEPs to gray matter. These montages may be more appropriate for interpreting CCEPs when using depth electrodes than the referential montage, which has typically been used in prior studies of CCEPs with subdural grids.

Centromedian thalamic deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Neuromodulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CM) has unclear effectiveness in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Prior reports suggest that it may be more effective in the generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of CM deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the authors' institution. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent CM DBS at Emory University, which occurred between December 2018 and May 2021. CM DBS electrodes were implanted using three different surgical methods, including frame-based, robot-assisted, and direct MRI-guided. Seizure frequency, stimulation parameters, and adverse events were recorded from subsequent clinical follow-up visits. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent CM DBS: 9 had symptomatic generalized epilepsy (including 5 with LGS), 3 had primary or idiopathic generalized epilepsy, and 2 had bifrontal focal epilepsy. At last follow-up (mean [± SEM] 19 ± 5 months, range 4.1-33 months, ≥ 6 months in 11 patients), the median seizure frequency reduction was 91%. Twelve patients (86%) were considered responders (≥ 50% decrease in seizure frequency), including 10 of 12 with generalized epilepsy and both patients with bifrontal epilepsy. Surgical adverse events were rare and included 1 patient with hardware breakage, 1 with a postoperative aspiration event, and 1 with a nonclinically significant intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: CM DBS was an effective treatment for drug-resistant generalized and bifrontal epilepsies. Additional studies and analyses may investigate whether CM DBS is best suited for specific epilepsy types, and the relationship of lead location to outcome in different epilepsies.

Electrical Wada for pre-surgical memory testing: a case report.

We report a case study of a surgical candidate, a 51-year-old woman with left temporal lobe epilepsy, who failed a left injection intracarotid amobarbital procedure (e.g., Wada test), scoring 0 of 8 items. This raised concerns for postoperative memory decline. However, the patient was uninterested in a neuromodulatory approach and wished to be reconsidered for surgery. A stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) was considered, encouraging the need for an alternative test to evaluate risk of memory decline. We developed a novel approach to testing memory during stimulation of a depth electrode implanted in the hippocampus, i.e., an electric Wada. During multiple stimulation trials across a range of amplitudes, the patient scored up to 8 of 8 items, which suggested strong contralateral memory support. The surgical team proceeded with a radiofrequency ablation and a subsequent SLAH. The patient remains seizure-free at 12 months post SLAH with no evidence of verbal or visuospatial memory decline based on a post-surgical neuropsychological battery. We believe that this case study provides a proof of concept for the feasibility and possible utility of an electric version of the Wada procedure. Future studies are needed to develop an optimal paradigm and to validate this approach.

Cognitive and Emotional Mapping With SEEG.

Mapping of cortical functions is critical for the best clinical care of patients undergoing epilepsy and tumor surgery, but also to better understand human brain function and connectivity. The purpose of this review is to explore existing and potential means of mapping higher cortical functions, including stimulation mapping, passive mapping, and connectivity analyses. We examine the history of mapping, differences between subdural and stereoelectroencephalographic approaches, and some risks and safety aspects, before examining different types of functional mapping. Much of this review explores the prospects for new mapping approaches to better understand other components of language, memory, spatial skills, executive, and socio-emotional functions. We also touch on brain-machine interfaces, philosophical aspects of aligning tasks to brain circuits, and the study of consciousness. We end by discussing multi-modal testing and virtual reality approaches to mapping higher cortical functions.

After-Hours EEG: Relative Value of Emergent Routine Versus Prolonged EEG Recordings.

OBJECTIVE: After-hours EEG is increasingly used in hospital patients. Although the detection of seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges has been shown to be higher with prolonged EEG (pEEG) than routine-duration EEG, the relative value for particular indications can inform utilization. METHOD: The Mayo EEG Report System was queried for after-hours emergent routine EEG (ErEEG) and pEEG performed between January 2015 and June 2015. Total 296 after-hours ErEEG were identified, of which 140 converted into pEEG were included in the study for direct comparison of two modalities. Indications were categorized as: mental status changes, recent seizures rule out continued nonconvulsive seizures, spells, and prognosis after anoxic brain injury. Categorical data were analyzed using the McNemar and Fisher exact tests; a P value of 0.05 was considered significant. RESULT: Prolonged EEG was superior to ErEEG for detection of interictal epileptiform discharges (61 vs. 48/140, P = 0.004) and seizures (29 vs. 17/140, P = 0.012). Seizure detection was greater for pEEG than ErEEG for the indication of evaluating for subclinical seizures after recent observed clinical seizures (14/41 [34.1%] versus 4/41 [9.8%], P = 0.002). There was no significant difference between modalities for seizure detection in patients undergoing evaluation of spells or mental status changes without previous observed seizures. Detection of seizures on pEEG was higher for recordings greater than 24 hours (8/46, 17%, P = 0.014) and 48 hours (19/26, 73%, P < 0.001) than recordings less than 24 hours (2/68, 3%). Seizure detection was higher with pEEG in comatose patients than ErEEG (17/51, 33% vs. 12/89, 13%; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Increased value was demonstrated for pEEG over ErEEG in patients undergoing evaluation after observed recent clinical seizures and for coma. No significant difference was found between ErEEG and pEEG for seizure detection in the relatively small subgroups of patients with mental status changes other than coma and without preceding seizure or spells.

A Guide for Cortical Electrical Stimulation Mapping.

Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) of the brain remains a major procedure for guiding epilepsy and tumor surgeries. This article collates available experiences and data in ESM to develop a guide for conducting the procedure. There are many factors that influence the yield of ESM. The stimulation parameters offered in this article need to be adjusted within safe limits to address the factors. Each ESM procedure should be tailored to the patient's age and baseline mental or psychological capacity. Stimulation-induced seizures and EEG afterdischarges disrupt ESM procedure and render the interpretation of the results difficult. There are specific measures that can lessen the risk of seizures and afterdischarges during ESM. Electrical stimulation mapping procedure requires several tasks on the part of those conducting the procedure, such as operating the stimulator and the EEG recording equipment, administering behavioral or language tests and observing both patient and EEG responses to the stimulation. A team of experienced staff is necessary for individual assumption of each task. Knowledge of the spatial relationship between electrode contacts and underlying normal or abnormal brain structures is essential for interpreting ESM results. When testing for motor or sensory response, be aware of the distinction between responses at the primary motor area and responses at the supplementary sensorimotor area. The anatomy of supplementary sensorimotor area is more variable and functional than it is fixed and structural, although its general confines and somatotopic organization are known. In addition, negative motor responses to stimulation must be recognized to avoid misinterpretation of ESM results, especially in language mapping.