RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is rapidly evolving with new combination therapies demonstrating improved response rates and survival. There are no head-to-head prospective trials comparing an immunotherapy doublet with an immunotherapy/tyrosine-kinase inhibitor-based combination. We compare real-world outcomes in patients treated with axitinib/pembrolizumab (axi/pembro) or ipilimumab/nivolumab (ipi/nivo). The primary endpoints were overall-survival (OS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used a de-identified database to select patients diagnosed with clear cell mRCC and treated with front-line axi/pembro or ipi/nivo from 2018 to 2022. Analyses are adjusted using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting, balancing age, gender, insurance, race, IMDC risk, and nephrectomy status. We compared survival by treatment groups using weighted and unweighted Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and weighted Cox proportional hazards regressions. RESULTS: We included a total of 1506 patients with mRCC who received frontline axi/pembro (n = 547) or ipi/nivo (n = 959). Median follow-up time was 20.0 months (range: 0.2-47.6). Baseline demographics were similar between the 2 cohorts. Adjusted median OS for the full population was 28.9 months for axi/pembro and was 24.3 months for ipi/nivo (P = .09). Twenty-four-month survival was 53.8% for axi/pembro treated patients and 50.2% for ipi/nivo treated patients. rwPFS was 10.6 months for axi/pembro treated patients and 6.9 months for ipi/nivo treated patients. Treatment with axi/pembro conferred improved survival in the IMDC favorable risk strata, with no significant difference in survival observed within the full cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, real-world study of patients treated with front-line combination therapy, patients with IMDC favorable risk disease had better survival when treated with axi/pembro compared to ipi/nivo. However, survival for the entire population and the 24-month median overall survival were not statistically different between treatment groups. Longer follow-up is necessary to discern any emerging significant differences.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Nivolumabe/farmacologia , Nivolumabe/uso terapêutico , Ipilimumab/farmacologia , Ipilimumab/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Axitinibe/farmacologia , Axitinibe/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) was challenged by the results of the CARMENA trial. Here we evaluate the role of CN in mRCC patients, including those receiving modern therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included patients with synchronous mRCC between 2011-2020 from the de-identified nationwide Flatiron Health database. We evaluated 3 groups: systemic therapy alone, CN followed by systemic therapy (up-front CN [uCN]) and systemic therapy followed by CN (deferred CN [dCN]). The primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS) in patients receiving systemic therapy alone vs uCN. Secondary outcome was overall survival in patients receiving uCN vs dCN. First-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analyses were conducted to overcome immortal time bias. Weighted Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to assess the effect of therapy on survival. RESULTS: Of 1,910 patients with mRCC, 972 (57%) received systemic therapy, 605 (32%) received uCN, 142 (8%) dCN and 191 (10%) CN alone; 433 (23%) patients received immunotherapy-based therapy. The adjusted mOS was significantly improved in first-treatment, landmark and time-varying covariate analysis (mOS 26.6 vs 14.6 months, 36.3 vs 21.1 months and 26.1 vs 12.2 months, respectively) in patients undergoing CN. Among patients receiving CN and systemic therapy, the timing of systemic therapy relative to CN was not significantly related to overall survival (HR=1.0, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, p=0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an oncologic role for CN in select mRCC patients. In patients receiving both CN and systemic therapy, the survival benefit compared to systemic alone was similar for up-front and deferred CN.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients with carcinoma invading bladder muscle (MIBC) and ureteric obstruction can safely receive cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (C-NAC), and to determine whether such patients require relief of obstruction with a ureteric stent or percutaneous nephrostomy prior to beginning C-NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis of MIBC patients receiving C-NAC and falling into three groups: no ureteric obstruction (NO); relieved ureteric obstruction (RO); and unrelieved ureteric obstruction (URO). To address whether patients with obstruction can safely receive C-NAC, we compared patients with NO to those with RO, with the primary outcome of premature chemotherapy discontinuation. To investigate whether patients with obstruction should have the obstruction relieved prior to NAC, we compared RO to URO patients using a primary composite outcome of grade ≥ 3 adverse events, premature chemotherapy discontinuation, dose reduction, or dose interruption. The primary outcomes were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed for the RO vs URO comparison, in which patients with only mild degrees of obstruction were excluded from the URO group. RESULTS: A total of 193 patients with NO, 49 with RO, and 35 with URO were analysed. There were no statistically significant differences between those with NO and those with RO in chemotherapy discontinuation (15% vs 22%; P = 0.3) or any secondary outcome. There was no statistically significant difference between those with RO and URO in the primary composite outcome (51% vs 53%; P = 1) or any secondary outcome. CONCLUSION: Patients with ureteric obstruction can safely receive C-NAC. Relief of obstruction was not associated with increased safety of C-NAC delivery.
Assuntos
Obstrução Ureteral , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino , Cistectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Músculos/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obstrução Ureteral/complicações , Obstrução Ureteral/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologiaRESUMO
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is an approved therapy for advanced metastatic mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient cancer regardless of tissue of origin. Although therapy is effective initially, recurrence rates are significant, and long-term outcomes remain poor for most patients. It is not currently recommended to give sequential ICB for advanced MMR-deficient colorectal cancer (CRC) or for patients with metastatic cancer from Lynch syndrome. The need for subsequent therapy options in advanced MMR-deficient cancer beyond the first ICB regimen arises in clinical practice, and there are often no effective standard chemotherapies or other targeted therapies. We report the case of a Lynch syndrome patient with metastatic CRC and urothelial cancer who was treated sequentially with pembrolizumab (targeting PD1), atezolizumab (targeting PD-L1), brief rechallenge with pembrolizumab, and finally the combination of ipilimumab (targeting CTLA-4) and nivolumab (targeting PD1). Over a 28-month period the patient experienced prolonged disease control with each different regimen the first time it was given, including metabolic response by positron emission tomography and computed tomography scanning and tumor marker reductions. The case suggests that some patients with advanced MMR-deficient CRC may experience meaningful clinical benefit from multiple sequential ICB regimens, a strategy that can be further tested in clinical trials. KEY POINTS: The case exemplifies clinical benefit from sequential immune checkpoint blockade in a patient with Lynch syndrome with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer and urothelial cancer.Metabolic response, with decreased fluorodeoxyglucose avidity on positron emission tomography and computed tomography, and reductions in tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen, were helpful in this case to monitor disease status over a 28-month period of therapy.The concept of sequential immune checkpoint blockade in patients with advanced mismatch repair-deficient cancer merits further study to determine which patients are most likely to benefit.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inibidores , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Colo/complicações , Neoplasias do Colo/secundário , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/complicações , Neoplasias Colorretais Hereditárias sem Polipose/patologia , Humanos , Ipilimumab/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Urológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Urológicas/patologiaRESUMO
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays an important role in cancer growth and progression. Paradoxically, the TME is capable of acting as both a potential barrier and facilitator of tumor proliferation by affecting various processes including local growth resistance, immune system interactions, and the formation of distant metastases. This important interaction between cancer cells and their local environment, composed of immune cells, angiogenic cells, lymphatic endothelial cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts is paramount to determine a cancer cell's ability to grow and ultimately metastasize. It is essential to understand this complex interplay in order to define treatment modalities to target the TME as part of anti-cancer therapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinogênese/patologia , Imunoterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/patologia , Microambiente Tumoral/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunidade Adaptativa/efeitos dos fármacos , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Carcinogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Carcinogênese/imunologia , Citocinas/imunologia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Progressão da Doença , Matriz Extracelular/efeitos dos fármacos , Matriz Extracelular/patologia , Humanos , Imunidade Inata/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Neoplasias/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Células Estromais/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Estromais/patologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The ≥3 cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) are commonly administered to treat MIBC. However, some patients are unable to complete all planned cycles of NAC. Prognosis of patients receiving <3 cycles of NAC has yet to be elucidated. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study quantifies pathologic complete response (pT0N0), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients treated with <3 cycles of NAC compared to ≥3 cycles. Patients with MIBC between 2004 and 2018 receiving at least 1 cycle of cisplatin-based NAC were included. Exclusion criteria were metastasis before initiation of NAC, progression/death during NAC. Patient characteristics were compared using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Kaplan Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models compared RFS adjusting for patient age, ECOG status, GFR, stage, node positivity, and NAC regimen. 5-year OS was analyzed via logistic regression with the aforementioned patient characteristics in the cohort of patients with 5 years of follow-up, unless deceased prior. RESULTS: In a cohort of 256 patients, the median RFS was 11.6 months (95% CI 7.79, 28.5) versus 79.5 months (95% CI 62.13, NA) in those receiving ≥3 cycles of NAC. Of 228 patients with documented pathologic stage, complete pathologic response (pT0) was observed in 9.4% of patients receiving <3 cycles, and 27.0% of patients receiving ≥3 cycles of NAC (P = .008). In 195 patients with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up, patients with <3 cycles the 5-year OS was 13.3% with <3 cycles compared to 53.3% with ≥3 cycles of NAC. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective, single-center investigation, early cessation of planned NAC was associated with worse pCR rate, RFS, and OS. While further prospective evaluation is required to confirm causality, clinicians should prioritize administering at least 3 cycles of NAC when feasible to optimize outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard of care (SOC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) includes cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting followed by radical cystectomy. Older patients often do not receive SOC due to perceived toxicity concerns despite guideline-directed recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin (aMVAC) in MIBC patients as a function of age. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis was conducted in 186 MIBC patients treated at Fox Chase Cancer Center between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2018. Adults with histologically proven muscle-invasive urothelial cancer were eligible. The exclusion criteria included nonurothelial histology, lack of muscularis propria invasion, and primary upper tract or metastatic disease. INTERVENTION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with aMVAC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Patients were stratified by age (<65, 65-74, and >75 yr old). Renal function was assessed at baseline and at time points after treatment. Clinicopathologic variables were compared between age groups to determine efficacy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in dose reductions, treatment interruptions, time to surgery, or adverse events when patients were stratified by age in univariate and multivariate analyses. Full safety data were not available due to the retrospective nature of the study. Baseline renal function was significantly worse among older patients, and the percent decline in creatinine clearance was greater with older age. We found comparable efficacy of aMVAC regardless of age. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated MVAC was safe and demonstrated efficacy in MIBC irrespective of age in this single-center, retrospective study. Careful selection based on clinical variables, and not age, should identify patients able to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY: We examined the feasibility of the standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen given prior to surgery in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Elderly patients experienced a greater decline in kidney function with treatment but not more complications than younger patients and tolerated therapy with minimal dose changes, resulting in benefit regardless of age.
Assuntos
Cisplatino , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Adulto , Humanos , Idoso , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Vimblastina/uso terapêutico , Vimblastina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Músculos/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The therapeutic landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has changed significantly since studies establishing superiority of cisplatin as first-line therapy were conducted. Most patients who are eligible now receive either maintenance or second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and data comparing first-line platinum chemotherapy agents in this setting is limited. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of first-line platinum chemotherapy agent on survival for patients who receive second-line ICI. This is a retrospective cohort study of real-world data, performed from January 1, 2015, to March 21, 2021, included patients with a diagnosis of metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. Exposure of interest was first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy (gemcitabine and/or cisplatin or gemcitabine and/or carboplatin) followed by single-agent second-line ICI. The primary endpoint was overall survival from start of second-line therapy. RESULTS: 2,042 patients received either gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (gem/carbo) as first-line therapy. The primary analysis of 890 patients who received second-line single-agent ICI had a median follow-up was 24.2 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Important differences in baseline demographics and/or clinical factors between groups were age, performance status, incidence of upper tract disease, and cisplatin eligibility. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) calculated from start of second-line therapy was longer in patients who received gem/cis compared to gem/carbo followed by ICI (median 9.3 vs. 8.8 months, Pâ¯=â¯0.0009). However, OS adjusted for covariates was not significantly different with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.79-1.13; Pâ¯=â¯0.50). A separate time-varying covariate model also showed no association between OS and first-line gem/cis (HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.84-1.19]) while receiving second-line ICI. CONCLUSIONS: Survival time on ICI in the second-line setting is the same regardless of choice of prior platinum agent (cisplatin vs. carboplatin) suggesting against specific synergy for one of these agents with ICI. However, a significantly greater proportion of patients in a landmark analysis had long-term benefit with cisplatin strongly supporting it is as the preferred first-line platinum agent.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/farmacologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Platina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00652.].
RESUMO
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, only a subset of patients (25-50%) have a pathologic complete response at cystectomy. Using a cohort of 58 patients from two phase 2 trials, our group previously reported that mutations in the ATM, RB1, and FANCC genes correlate with complete response to cisplatin-based NAC, and consequently improve OS and disease-specific survival (DSS). These trials enrolled patients with T2-4 (N0 or N1) MIBC and treated them with accelerated/dose-dense NAC with methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin, or gemcitabine and cisplatin, with a plan for curative cystectomy. Updated long-term follow-up (median 74 mo) shows that significantly greater OS and DSS was maintained for patients with ATM, RB1, or FANCC mutations. The 5-yr survival rate for patients with at least one mutation was 85%, compared to 45% for patients without a mutation. On the basis of the associations with response and long-term OS and DSS, we propose that these alterations may be useful as predictive biomarkers to allow clinicians to prioritize patients who are most likely to benefit from NAC before radical cystectomy. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report we looked at outcomes for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy before surgery (neoadjuvant) who had mutations in a set of DNA damage repair genes (ATM, RB1, FANCC) compared to those who did not. We found that patients who had at least one mutation in one of these genes survived longer after receiving cisplatin chemotherapy before surgery than patients who did not.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Reparo do DNA , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos de Coortes , Cistectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Invasividade Neoplásica , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: Liquid biopsy (LB) captures dynamic genomic alterations (alts) across metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) therapy and may complement tissue biopsy (TB). We sought to describe the utility of LB and better understand mCRC biology during therapy. Methods: Thirty-three patients (pts) with mCRC underwent LB. We used permutation-based t-tests to assess associations between alts, and clinical variables and used Kendall's tau to measure correlations. Results: Of 33 pts, 15 were women; 22 had colon, and the rest rectal cancer. Pts received a median of two lines of therapy before LB. Nineteen pts had limited testing on TB (RAS/RAF/TP53/APC), 11 extended NGS, and 3 no TB. Maxpct and alts correlated with CEA (p < 0.001, respectively). In 3/5 pts with serial LB, CEA correlated with maxpct trend, and CT tumor burden. In 6 pts, mutant RAS was seen in LB and not TB; 5/6 had received anti-EGFR therapy prior to LB, suggesting RAS alts developed post-therapy. In two pts RAS-mutated by TB, no RAS alts were detected on LB; these pts had low disease burden on CT at time of LB that also did not reveal APC or TP53 alts. In six patients who were KRAS wt based on TB, post anti-EGFR LB revealed subclonal KRAS mutations, likely a treatment effect. The median number of alts was higher post anti-EGFR LB (n = 12) vs. anti-EGFR naïve LB (n = 22) (9.5 vs. 5.5, p = 0.059) but not statistically significant. More alts were also noted in post anti-EGFR therapy LB vs. KRAS wt anti-EGFR-naïve LB (n = 6) (9.5 vs. 5) among patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, although the difference was not significant (p = 0.182). Conclusions: LB across mCRC therapy detects driver mutations, monitors disease burden, and identifies sub-clonal alts that reflect drug resistance, tumor evolution, and heterogeneity. Interpretation of LB results is impacted by clinical context.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Accelerated (also termed dose-dense, DD) chemotherapy regimens such as accelerated methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin have shown better efficacy and tolerability in the metastatic setting, and shortened the time to surgery in the neoadjuvant setting compared to standard-schedule regimens. We hypothesized that a DD schedule of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) would shorten the time to surgery and yield similar pathologic complete response rates (pT0) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) compared with historical controls with standard GC. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant DDGC in MIBC. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with cT2-4a, N0-1, M0 MIBC were eligible and received three 14-d cycles of DDGC with pegfilgrastim support followed by radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. The primary end point was the pT0 rate. Molecular subtypes were assigned and correlated with survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Thirty-one patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, of whom 58% had baseline clinical stage >T2N0M0; the median age was 69 yr. Ten patients (32%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-49%) achieved ypT0N0 status at cystectomy. Another four patients (13%, 95% CI 1-25%) were downstaged to non-muscle-invasive (