Geographic and economic influences on benralizumab prescribing for severe asthma in Japan.

Benralizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-5 receptors, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid requirements for severe, uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma. In Japan, geographic disparities in asthma outcomes suggest differential prescribing and access. This study aimed to quantify regional prescribing variations for benralizumab nationwide. Using Japan's National Database (NDB) of insurance claims (2009-2019), benralizumab standardized claim ratios (SCRs) were calculated for 47 prefectures. Correlations between SCRs and other biologics' SCRs, economic variables like average income, and physician densities were evaluated through univariate analysis and multivariate regressions. Income-related barriers to optimal prescribing were examined. Wide variation emerged in benralizumab SCRs, from 40.1 to 184.2 across prefectures. SCRs strongly correlated with omalizumab (r = 0.61, p < 0.00001) and mepolizumab (r = 0.43, p = 0.0024). Average monthly income also positively correlated with benralizumab SCRs (r = 0.45, p = 0.0016), whereas lifestyle factors were insignificant. Respiratory specialist density modestly correlated with SCRs (r = 0.29, p = 0.047). In multivariate regressions, average income remained the most robust predictor (B = 0.74, p = 0.022). Benralizumab SCRs strongly associate with income metrics more than healthcare infrastructure/population factors. Many regions show low SCRs, constituting apparent prescribing gaps. Access barriers for advanced asthma therapies remain inequitable among Japan's income strata. Addressing affordability alongside specialist allocation can achieve better prescribing quality and asthma outcomes.

Improved diagnostic accuracy with three lung tumor markers compared to six-marker panel.

Background: Combining multiple tumor markers increases sensitivity for lung cancer diagnosis in the cost of false positive. However, some would like to check as many as tumor markers in the fear of missing cancer. We though to propose a panel of fewer tumor markers for lung cancer diagnosis. Methods: Patients with suspected lung cancer who simultaneously underwent all six tests [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA), squamous cell carcinoma-associated antigen (SCC), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), and sialyl Lewis-X antigen (SLX)] were included. Tumor markers with significant impact on the lung cancer in a logistic regression model were included in our panel. Area under the curve (AUC) was compared between our panel and the panel of all six. Results: We included 1,733 [median 72 years, 1,128 men, 605 women, 779 (45%) confirmed lung cancer]. Logistic regression analysis suggested CEA, CYFRA, and NSE were independently associated with the lung cancer diagnosis. The panel of these three tumor markers [AUC =0.656, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.630-0.682, sensitivity 0.650, specificity 0.662] had better (P<0.001) diagnostic performance than six tumor markers (AUC =0.575, 95% CI: 0.548-0.602, sensitivity 0.829, specificity 0.321). Conclusions: Compared to applying all six markers (at least one marker above the upper limit of normal), the panel with three markers (at least one marker above the upper limit of normal) led to a better predictive value by lowering the risk of false positives.

HLA-DQA1*01:03 and DQB1*06:01 are risk factors for severe COVID-19 pneumonia.

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 includes a wide range of manifestations, from mild symptoms to severe pneumonia. HLA system plays a pivotal role in immune responses to infectious diseases. The purpose of our study was to investigate the association between HLA and COVID-19 severity in a Japanese population. The study included 209 Japanese COVID-19 patients aged ≥20 years. Saliva samples were collected and used to determine the HLA genotype by HLA imputation through genome-wide association analyses. The association between HLA genotype and COVID-19 severity was then evaluated. The allele frequency was compared between patients with respiratory failure (severe group: 91 cases) and those without respiratory failure (non-severe group: 118 cases), categorising the data into three time periods: pre-Omicron epidemic period, Omicron epidemic period, and total period of this study (from January 2021 to May 2023). In comparing the severe and non-severe groups, the frequencies of the HLA-DQA1*01:03 (35.1% vs. 10.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 4.57, corrected p [pc] = 0.041) and -DQB1*06:01 (32.4% vs. 7.9%, OR = 5.54, pc = 0.030) alleles were significantly higher in the severe group during the pre-Omicron epidemic period. During the Omicron epidemic period, HLA-DQB1*06 (32.4% vs. 7.9%, OR = 5.54, pc = 0.030) was significantly higher in the severe group. During total period of this study, HLA-DQA1*01:03 (30.2% vs. 14.4%, OR = 2.57, corrected pc = 0.0013) and -DQB1*06:01 (44.5% vs. 26.7%, OR = 2.20, pc = 0.013) alleles were significantly higher in the severe group. HLA-DQB1*06:01 and -DQA1*01:03 were in strong linkage disequilibrium with each other (r2 = 0.91) during total period of this study, indicating that these two alleles form a haplotype. The frequency of the HLA-DQA1*01:03-DQB1*06:01 in the severe group was significantly higher than in the non-severe group during pre-Omicron epidemic period (32.4% vs. 7.9%, OR = 5.59, pc = 0.00072), and total period of this study (28.6% vs. 13.1%, OR = 2.63, pc = 0.0013). During Omicron epidemic period, the haplotype did not demonstrate statistical significance, although the odds ratio indicated a value greater 1. Frequencies of the HLA-DQA1*01:03 and -DQB1*06:01 alleles were significantly higher in severe COVID-19 patients, suggesting that these alleles are risk factors for severe COVID-19 pneumonia in the Japanese population.

Efficacy and safety of benralizumab in elderly patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

Background: Biologics are the important drugs for severe asthma, but clinical trials included few elderly patients. Data on the safety and efficacy of benralizumab in elderly asthma patients are limited. Methods: This clinical study was a multicentre, retrospective, observational study at two hospitals. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with severe asthma treated with benralizumab were included. Elderly patients were defined as those aged 70 years or older. Efficacy and safety were then analyzed in elderly and non-elderly patients. The primary endpoints were the annual number of asthma exacerbations for efficacy and the discontinuation rate due to adverse events for safety. Results: Between August 2016 and October 2022, 61 patients were enrolled; 10 patients were excluded, and 51 (22 elderly, 29 non-elderly) patients were analyzed. In elderly patients, the annual number of asthma exacerbations before treatment with benralizumab (pre-benralizumab) was 3.78, and the number during treatment with benralizumab was 1.26, a decrease of 2.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.74, p < 0.001). In non-elderly patients, the annual number of asthma exacerbation in the pre-benralizumab period was 3.24, and during treatment with benralizumab it was 0.68, a decrease of 2.56 (95% CI, 1.3 to 3.82, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events (elderly vs non-elderly, 2 (9%) vs 0 (0%), p = 0.18). Conclusion: Benralizumab reduced the annual number of asthma exacerbations and was well tolerated in elderly patients.