RESUMO
With the aim to shorten the time for diagnosis and accelerate access to correct management, a non-invasive diagnostic test for endometriosis was developed and validated. The IVD test combines an ELISA test kit to quantify CA125 and BDNF concentrations in serum and a data treatment algorithm hosted in medical software processing results from the ELISA test and responses to six clinical variables. Serum samples and clinical variables extracted from psychometric questionnaires from 77 patients were collected from the Oxford Endometriosis CaRe Centre biobank (UK). Case/control classification was performed based on laparoscopy and histological verification of the excised lesions. Biomarkers serum concentrations and clinical variables were introduced to the software, which generates the qualitative diagnostic result ("positive" or "negative"). This test allowed the detection of 32% of cases with superficial endometriosis, which is an added value given the limited efficacy of existing imaging techniques. Even in the presence of various confounding medical conditions, the test maintained a specificity of 100%, supporting its suitability for use in patients with underlying medical conditions.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores , Antígeno Ca-125 , Endometriose , Humanos , Endometriose/diagnóstico , Endometriose/sangue , Endometriose/patologia , Feminino , Adulto , Antígeno Ca-125/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Fator Neurotrófico Derivado do Encéfalo/sangue , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas de Membrana/sangue , Algoritmos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the role of PGE2 in regulating plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in human primary endometrial endothelial cells (HEECs) from women with normal menstrual bleeding (NMB) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). DESIGN: In vitro study using endometrial endothelial cells. SETTING: Research laboratory setting. PATIENTS: Women with normal menstrual bleeding (NMB) and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) provided endometrial biopsy samples. INTERVENTIONS: PGE2 and PGE2 receptor-selective agonists were administered to cultured HEECs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Levels of PAI-1 and tPA in NMB-HEECs and HMB-HEECs after treatment with PGE2 and receptor-selective agonists. RESULTS: PGE2 increased total PAI-1 levels in NMB-HEECs, but not in HMB-HEECs, which had higher baseline PAI-1 levels. PTGER1 and PTGER2 agonists increased PAI-1 in NMB-HEECs, while PTGER3 and PTGER4 did not. PGE2 had no effect on tPA levels in either NMB-HEECs or HMB-HEECs. CONCLUSIONS: PGE2, through PTGER1 and PTGER2, regulates the plasminogen activator system in NMB-HEECs, suggesting a role in reducing fibrinolytic activity during normal menstrual cycles. The lack of PGE2 effect and elevated baseline PAI-1 in HMB-HEECs support using this in vitro model to further understand prostaglandin pathways in normal and heavy menstrual bleeding.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of emergency contraception (EC) regimens used within 72 hours of unprotected intercourse in individuals weighing ≥80 kg. STUDY DESIGN: We enrolled reproductive-aged healthy women in a multicenter, single-blind, randomized study of levonorgestrel 1.5 mg (LNG1X) and 3.0 mg (LNG2X) and ulipristal acetate 30 mg (UPA) (enrollment goal 1200). Key eligibility requirements included regular cycles, weight >/= 80kg, unprotected intercourse within 72 hours, no recent use of hormonal contraception, a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT), and willingness to abstain from intercourse until next menses. To assess our primary outcome of incidence of pregnancy, participants completed home UPTs; if no menses by 2-weeks post-treatment, or a positive UPT, they returned for an in-person visit with quantitative serum human chorionic gonadotropin and ultrasound. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 532; 44 were not dosed or not evaluable for primary end point, leaving an analyzable sample of 488 (173 LNG1X, 158 LNG2X, 157 UPA) with similar demographics between groups (mean age 29.6 years [5.74], body mass index 37.09 kg/m2 [6.95]). Five pregnancies occurred (LNG1X n = 1, LNG2X n = 1, UPA n = 3); none occurred during the highest at-risk window (day of ovulation and the 3 days prior). We closed the study before achieving our enrollment goal because the low pregnancy rate in all groups established futility based on an interim blinded analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although slow enrollment limited our study power, we found no differences in pregnancy rates between EC regimens among women weighing 80 kg or more. Our results are not able to refute or support differences between the treatment arms. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clincialtrials.gov Clinical trials#: NCT03537768. IMPLICATIONS: Women weighing 80 kg or more experienced no differences in pregnancy rates between oral EC regimens but due to several significant study limitations including sample size and the lack of a study population at high risk of pregnancy, our results are not able to determine if differences in treatment effectiveness exist.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção Pós-Coito , Levanogestrel , Norpregnadienos , Humanos , Feminino , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Norpregnadienos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Gravidez , Anticoncepção Pós-Coito/métodos , Método Simples-Cego , Adulto Jovem , Peso Corporal/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Taxa de GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate ovulation risk among women enrolling in an emergency contraception (EC) study by measuring contraceptive steroids and ovarian hormones. STUDY DESIGN: We used standard chemiluminescent assays to evaluate endogenous hormones (estradiol, progesterone, follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone) and liquid chromatography-tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry to simultaneously analyze concentrations of ethinylestradiol, dienogest, norelgestromin (NGMN), norethindrone (NET), gestodene, levonorgestrel (LNG), etonogestrel (ENG), segesterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), and drospirenone in serum samples obtained at the time of enrollment in a recent study comparing oral ulipristal acetate and LNG EC in women with weight ≥80 kg reporting no recent use of hormonal contraception. RESULTS: We enrolled 532 and obtained a valid baseline blood sample from 520 women. Of these, 117 (22.5%) had detectable concentrations of progestin (MPA [n = 58, 11.2%], LNG [50, 9.6%], ENG [11, 2.1%], NET [5, 0.96%], NGMN [3, 0.06%], or drospirenone [1, 0.02%]). LNG was co-detected in all three participants with samples containing NGMN. Multiple progestins were detected in eight other women: ENG/MPA (1), ENG/LNG (2), and MPA/LNG (5). Samples from 55 (10.6%) had concentrations of one or more progestin considered above the minimum level for contraceptive (MPA ≥ 0.1 ng/mL, n = 19; NGMN/LNG ≥ 0.2 ng/mL, n = 31; ENG ≥ 0.09 ng/mL, n = 8; NET ≥ 0.35 ng/mL, n = 4). We detected concentrations of serum progesterone ≥ 3 ng/mL, indicative of luteal phase (postovulation) status, in an additional 194 (37.3%) samples. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of enrolled in our clinical trial of oral EC had evidence of prior ovulation at the time of enrollment. Additionally, about 23% had evidence of recent use of hormonal contraception. These results would have decreased the expected risk of pregnancy in the study. IMPLICATIONS: Many participants in a recent clinical trial of oral emergency contraception did not appear to be at risk for pregnancy or would not have benefited from intervention due to cycle timing. Investigators should consider the effects of these findings on expected pregnancy rates when determining sample size in future EC clinical trials, particularly when using noninferiority designs or historical controls.
Assuntos
Progesterona , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem , Progesterona/sangue , Ovulação/efeitos dos fármacos , Estradiol/sangue , Anticoncepção Pós-Coito/métodos , Hormônio Luteinizante/sangue , Hormônio Foliculoestimulante/sangue , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/sangue , Adolescente , NorpregnadienosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to identify appropriate definitions and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for each of the eight core outcomes previously selected for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause: pain with sex, vulvovaginal dryness, vulvovaginal discomfort or irritation, discomfort or pain when urinating, change in most bothersome symptom, distress, bother or interference of genitourinary symptoms, satisfaction with treatment, and side effects. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify possible definitions and PROMs, including their measurement properties. Identified definitions and relevant PROMs with acceptable measurement properties were entered into an international consensus process involving 28 participants from 10 countries to achieve final recommendations for each core outcome. RESULTS: A total of 87 publications reporting on 34 PROMs were identified from 21,207 publications screened. Of these 34 PROMs, 29 were not considered to sufficiently map onto the core outcomes, and 26 of these also had insufficient measurement properties. Therefore, only five PROMs corresponding to two core outcomes were considered for recommendation. We recommend the PROMIS Scale v2.0 - Sexual Function and Satisfaction: Vaginal Discomfort with Sexual Activity to measure the outcome of "pain with sexual activity" and the Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) Questionnaire to measure "distress, bother or interference" from genitourinary symptoms. Six definitions of "side effects" were identified and considered. We recommend that all trials report adverse events in study participants, which is a requirement of Good Clinical Practice. CONCLUSIONS: Suitable PROMs and definitions were identified to measure three of eight core outcomes. Because of the lack of existing measures, which align with the core outcomes and have evidence of high-quality measurement properties, future work will focus on developing or validating PROMs for the remaining five core outcomes.
Assuntos
Menopausa , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Humanos , Feminino , Menopausa/fisiologia , Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Disfunções Sexuais Fisiológicas , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to identify suitable definitions and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess each of the six core outcomes previously identified through the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global consensus process relating to vasomotor symptoms: frequency, severity, distress/bother/interference, impact on sleep, satisfaction with treatment, and side effects. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant definitions for the outcome of side-effects and PROMs with acceptable measurement properties for the remaining five core outcomes. The consensus process, involving 36 participants from 16 countries, was conducted to review definitions and PROMs and make final recommendations for the measurement of each core outcome. RESULTS: A total of 21,207 publications were screened from which 119 reporting on 40 PROMs were identified. Of these 40 PROMs, 36 either did not adequately map onto the core outcomes or lacked sufficient measurement properties. Therefore, only four PROMs corresponding to two of the six core outcomes were considered for recommendation. We recommend the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale to measure the domain of distress, bother, or interference of vasomotor symptoms and to capture impact on sleep (one item in the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale captures interference with sleep). Six definitions of "side effects" were identified and considered. We recommend that all trials report adverse events, which is a requirement of Good Clinical Practice. CONCLUSIONS: We identified suitable definitions and PROMs for only three of the six core outcomes. No suitable PROMs were found for the remaining three outcomes (frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms and satisfaction with treatment). Future studies should develop and validate PROMs for these outcomes.